U. von Matt
About
In The Last Decade
U. von Matt
11 papers receiving 481 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 143
- Computational Mechanics 129
- Numerical Analysis 100
- Mathematical Physics 93
- Applied Mathematics 83
Countries citing papers authored by U. von Matt
This map shows the geographic impact of U. von Matt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. von Matt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. von Matt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by U. von Matt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. von Matt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. von Matt. The network helps show where U. von Matt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. von Matt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. von Matt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. von Matt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. von Matt. U. von Matt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gauss quadrature | 6 |
| 2 | Smoothing filters | 11 |
| 3 | 155 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 146 | |
| 10 | 103 | |
| 11 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.