U. P. Hedrick

49 total papers · 788 total citations
6 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

U. P. Hedrick is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Food Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, U. P. Hedrick has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 1 paper in Food Science and 1 paper in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in U. P. Hedrick's work include Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (1 paper), Seed and Plant Biochemistry (1 paper) and Ziziphus Jujuba Studies and Applications (1 paper). U. P. Hedrick is often cited by papers focused on Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (1 paper), Seed and Plant Biochemistry (1 paper) and Ziziphus Jujuba Studies and Applications (1 paper). U. P. Hedrick collaborates with scholars based in . U. P. Hedrick's co-authors include E. Lewis Sturtevant and Joseph Ewan and has published in prestigious journals such as Taxon, Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) and The Mississippi Valley Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

U. P. Hedrick

5 papers receiving 175 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
U. P. Hedrick	134	47	44	39	26	6	245
Andrea Dénes	135 1.0×	90 1.9×	44 1.0×	46 1.2×	23 0.9×	9	331
Iwa Kołodziejska	125 0.9×	75 1.6×	32 0.7×	30 0.8×	21 0.8×	9	212
Ilia Mikerezi	93 0.7×	36 0.8×	13 0.3×	39 1.0×	15 0.6×	12	310
J. C. Th. Uphof	115 0.9×	38 0.8×	39 0.9×	56 1.4×	12 0.5×	3	191
Hoàng Văn Sâm	83 0.6×	25 0.5×	56 1.3×	55 1.4×	7 0.3×	13	194
J. R. Press	172 1.3×	37 0.8×	123 2.8×	72 1.8×	20 0.8×	8	317
María M. Manifesto	241 1.8×	32 0.7×	23 0.5×	37 0.9×	6 0.2×	14	304
Amare Getahun	145 1.1×	22 0.5×	57 1.3×	35 0.9×	10 0.4×	10	325
Stefano Marsili	168 1.3×	93 2.0×	37 0.8×	34 0.9×	29 1.1×	12	294
Virginia Easton Smith	127 0.9×	47 1.0×	39 0.9×	63 1.6×	24 0.9×	7	321

Countries citing papers authored by U. P. Hedrick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. P. Hedrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. P. Hedrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. P. Hedrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. P. Hedrick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. P. Hedrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. P. Hedrick. The network helps show where U. P. Hedrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. P. Hedrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. P. Hedrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. P. Hedrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. P. Hedrick. U. P. Hedrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact