Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Catalogue of cataclysmic binaries, low–mass X-ray binaries and related objects (Seventh edition)
This map shows the geographic impact of U. Kolb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Kolb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Kolb more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Kolb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Kolb. The network helps show where U. Kolb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Kolb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Kolb.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Kolb based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with U. Kolb. U. Kolb is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Konacki, M., P. Sybilski, S. Kozłowski, et al.. (2017). The Solaris-Panoptes Global Network of Robotic Telescopes and the Borowiec Satellite Laser Ranging System for SST: A Progress Report. amos. 101.1 indexed citations
Kolb, U.. (2014). The PIRATE facility: at the crossroads of research and teaching. Open Research Online (The Open University). 45. 16–19.1 indexed citations
9.
Kolb, U., et al.. (2014). TEACHING UNDERGRADUATE ASTROPHYSICS WITH PIRATE. Open Research Online (The Open University). 45. 129–132.1 indexed citations
10.
Kolb, U., et al.. (2014). HOW EFFECTIVE IS REMOTE INSTRUCTION FOR ASTROPHYSICS. Open Research Online (The Open University). 45. 133–134.1 indexed citations
11.
Wyrzykowski, Ł., H. Campbell, S. E. Koposov, et al.. (2013). Multiband photometric follow-up of ASASSN-13aw (SN 2013dr). The astronomer's telegram. 5245. 1.1 indexed citations
12.
Lucas, Robert J. & U. Kolb. (2011). Software architecture for an unattended remotely controlled telescope. Open Research Online (The Open University). 121. 265–269.1 indexed citations
13.
Henze, M., V. Burwitz, W. Pietsch, et al.. (2010). Apparent Nova in M31: M31N 2010-07a. Open Research Online (The Open University). 2358. 2.
Kolb, U., et al.. (2005). Thermal-timescale mass transfer and evolved donor stars in CVs. Open Research Online (The Open University). 330. 17.1 indexed citations
Kolb, U., et al.. (2002). VizieR Online Data Catalog: Catalog of Cataclysmic Variables (Downes+ 2001-2005).2 indexed citations
18.
North, Rachel, T. R. Marsh, U. Kolb, R. Stehle, & R. C. Smith. (2000). EM Cygni: A Companionable Dwarf Nova. New Astronomy Reviews. 44. 29.1 indexed citations
19.
Kolb, U. & I. Baraffe. (1999). Secondary Stars in CVs: The Theoretical Perspective.11 indexed citations
20.
Kolb, U. & M. Politano. (1996). The Contribution of ONeMg Novae to the (26) AL Production in the Galaxy. AAS. 189(3). 909–922.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.