U. Hannemann
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- S. FählerL. SchultzV. NeuJulia LyubinaL. F. CohenMary P. RyanB. HolzäpfelKarl‐Hartmut Müller
- Topics
- Magnetic Properties of Alloys (16 papers)Magnetic properties of thin films (12 papers)Magnetic Properties and Applications (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsCondensed Matter PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
U. Hannemann
16 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 305
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 173
- Materials Chemistry 114
- Condensed Matter Physics 101
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 30
Countries citing papers authored by U. Hannemann
This map shows the geographic impact of U. Hannemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Hannemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Hannemann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by U. Hannemann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Hannemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Hannemann. The network helps show where U. Hannemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of U. Hannemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U. Hannemann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U. Hannemann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U. Hannemann. U. Hannemann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 70 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 5 |
About U. Hannemann
U. Hannemann is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties of Alloys (16 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (12 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (305 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (101 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (173 citations). U. Hannemann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include S. Fähler, L. Schultz, V. Neu, Julia Lyubina, L. F. Cohen, Mary P. Ryan, B. Holzäpfel, Karl‐Hartmut Müller, Neil McN. Alford and Manfred Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.