T.W.D.P. van Os

27 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers

T.W.D.P. van Os
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 250
  • Social Psychology 294
  • Clinical Psychology 273
  • Biological Psychiatry 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
Replace Claudio Fullerton with:
Claudio Fullerton Chile
Amresh Shrivastava Canada
Bill Jerrom United Kingdom
Jessica Dagani Italy
Risto Antikainen Finland
Tjalling J. Holwerda Netherlands
Jean‐Luc Roelandt France
David J. Rissmiller United States
Kelvin M. T. Fung Hong Kong
Robert E. Feinstein United States
T.W.D.P. van Os relative to Claudio Fullerton Chile Claudio Fullerton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Claudio Fullerton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.W.D.P. van Os

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.W.D.P. van Os's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.W.D.P. van Os with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.W.D.P. van Os more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.W.D.P. van Os

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.W.D.P. van Os. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.W.D.P. van Os. The network helps show where T.W.D.P. van Os may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.W.D.P. van Os, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.W.D.P. van Os Line = papers co-authored together T.W.D.P. van Os links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199986
2 201082
3 201366
4 201060
5 200757
6 200447
7 199945
8 200535
9 200531
10 200523
11 200623
12 200922
13 200321
14 200217
15 200616
16 201515
17 200914
18 200614
19 200113
20 201412

About T.W.D.P. van Os

T.W.D.P. van Os is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (13 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (250 citations), Social Psychology (294 citations), Clinical Psychology (273 citations), Biological Psychiatry (27 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). T.W.D.P. van Os has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johan Ormel, Rob H. S. van den Brink, Klaas van der Meer, Jack A. Jenner, Bea Tiemens, Harm van Marwijk, Christina M. van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Durk Wiersma, Albert F.G. Leentjens and H. N. Alexander Logemann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Psychological Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and General Hospital Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026