Tucker Brooke

557 total citations
3 papers, 11 citations indexed

About

Tucker Brooke is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Tucker Brooke has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 11 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Anthropology, 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 2 papers in History. Recurrent topics in Tucker Brooke's work include Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). Tucker Brooke is often cited by papers focused on Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). Tucker Brooke collaborates with scholars based in . Tucker Brooke's co-authors include Christopher Marlowe and Thomas H. Nash and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Tucker Brooke

2 papers receiving 3 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tucker Brooke	2	3	3	3	2	1	3	11
Pliny	2	4 1.3×	2 0.7×	2 0.7×			2	7
Vernon Loggins	3	2 0.7×	3 1.0×	1 0.3×	3 1.5×		4	10
Harry B. Weiss Germany	3	1 0.3×	3 1.0×	2 0.7×	2 1.0×		4	8
C. H. Herford	2	3 1.0×		4 1.3×	1 0.5×		5	12
T. Volker Austria	1	5 1.7×		2 0.7×	2 1.0×		2	11
J. L. Gillin	2	4 1.3×	1 0.3×	3 1.0×	4 2.0×		6	9
Paul Lewinson	2		3 1.0×	3 1.0×	1 0.5×		7	15
M. P. Charlesworth	2	5 1.7×		2 0.7×	2 1.0×		4	12
R. R. Marett	2	3 1.0×	2 0.7×	1 0.3×			4	6
LaRue Van Hook	2	7 2.3×	3 1.0×		2 1.0×		3	15

Countries citing papers authored by Tucker Brooke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tucker Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tucker Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tucker Brooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tucker Brooke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tucker Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tucker Brooke. The network helps show where Tucker Brooke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tucker Brooke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tucker Brooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tucker Brooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tucker Brooke. Tucker Brooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

3 of 3 papers shown

1.

Brooke, Tucker. (2007). The Marlowe canon. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

2.

Marlowe, Christopher, Thomas H. Nash, & Tucker Brooke. (1966). The Life of Marlowe, And, the Tragedy of Dido, Queen of Carthage. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations

3.

Brooke, Tucker, et al.. (1958). English drama, 1580-1642. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact