Tuck C. Choy

948 total citations · 1 hit paper
3 papers, 714 citations indexed

About

Tuck C. Choy is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Tuck C. Choy has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 714 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 1 paper in Condensed Matter Physics and 1 paper in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in Tuck C. Choy's work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper), Magnetic properties of thin films (1 paper) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (1 paper). Tuck C. Choy is often cited by papers focused on Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper), Magnetic properties of thin films (1 paper) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (1 paper). Tuck C. Choy collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Tuck C. Choy's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) and Oxford University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Tuck C. Choy

3 papers receiving 685 citations

Hit Papers

Effective medium theory principles and applications 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tuck C. Choy Australia 2 257 208 199 199 187 3 714
Harsha Reddy United States 9 342 1.3× 230 1.1× 152 0.8× 299 1.5× 211 1.1× 20 678
Shaista Babar United States 7 250 1.0× 238 1.1× 126 0.6× 200 1.0× 130 0.7× 9 571
R. Jenkins United States 12 219 0.9× 225 1.1× 195 1.0× 299 1.5× 223 1.2× 68 888
Kristin Pfeiffer Germany 9 197 0.8× 316 1.5× 121 0.6× 120 0.6× 160 0.9× 16 642
Leonid Braginsky Russia 14 103 0.4× 225 1.1× 298 1.5× 148 0.7× 369 2.0× 42 871
А. В. Гончаренко Ukraine 13 365 1.4× 158 0.8× 167 0.8× 224 1.1× 189 1.0× 49 655
S. Machulik Germany 6 276 1.1× 382 1.8× 270 1.4× 245 1.2× 156 0.8× 7 858
M. Chashnikova Germany 6 276 1.1× 382 1.8× 282 1.4× 242 1.2× 124 0.7× 9 869
Jan Kischkat Germany 9 291 1.1× 419 2.0× 300 1.5× 237 1.2× 124 0.7× 18 942
A. Aleksandrova Germany 8 273 1.1× 401 1.9× 290 1.5× 234 1.2× 124 0.7× 20 900

Countries citing papers authored by Tuck C. Choy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tuck C. Choy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tuck C. Choy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tuck C. Choy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tuck C. Choy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tuck C. Choy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tuck C. Choy. The network helps show where Tuck C. Choy may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
1.
Choy, Tuck C.. (2015). Effective Medium Theory. Oxford University Press eBooks. 146 indexed citations
2.
Choy, Tuck C.. (1999). Effective medium theory principles and applications. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 567 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Choy, Tuck C.. (1997). Mesoscopic modelling of high TC superconductors. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 2(6). 733–738. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026