Trine Nedergaard
About
In The Last Decade
Trine Nedergaard
8 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 173
- Oncology 152
- Molecular Biology 97
- Dermatology 61
- Genetics 53
Countries citing papers authored by Trine Nedergaard
This map shows the geographic impact of Trine Nedergaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trine Nedergaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trine Nedergaard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Trine Nedergaard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trine Nedergaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trine Nedergaard. The network helps show where Trine Nedergaard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trine Nedergaard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trine Nedergaard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trine Nedergaard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trine Nedergaard. Trine Nedergaard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 69 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.