T.R. Oakes

1.5k citations
31 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

T.R. Oakes

27 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

T.R. Oakes
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 665
  • Biological Psychiatry 63
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 80
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 264
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 163
Replace Paul Gravel with:
Paul Gravel Canada
Karmen K. Yoder United States
Lieuwe Appel Sweden
Markus Savli Austria
Jason Smucny United States
Peter Kalus Germany
Yoshitaka Kumakura Japan
Shannan Henry United States
Ottavia Dipasquale United Kingdom
T.R. Oakes relative to Paul Gravel Canada Paul Gravel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul Gravel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.R. Oakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.R. Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.R. Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.R. Oakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.R. Oakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.R. Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.R. Oakes. The network helps show where T.R. Oakes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.R. Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.R. Oakes Line = papers co-authored together T.R. Oakes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004295
2 2003231
3 2005144
4 2006101
5 199974
6 200871
7
Fluorine-18-fluoro-L-DOPA dosimetry with carbidopa pretreatment.
199845
8 201631
9 200828
10 200926
11 199523
12 202019
13 199217
14 199814
15 199814
16 199412
17 19938
18 19947
19 20096
20 20086

About T.R. Oakes

T.R. Oakes is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiation and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (665 citations), Biological Psychiatry (63 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (80 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (264 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (163 citations). T.R. Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Davidson, Moo K. Chung, Andrew S. Fox, Christine L. Larson, Heather C. Abercrombie, Diego A. Pizzagalli, Stacey M. Schaefer, Ruth M. Benca, Andrew S. Fox and Steven E. Shelton. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, NeuroImage, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Brain Research and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact