TR New
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Fossil Insects in Amber
- Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Biological Control of Invasive Species
Papers in
-
- Fossil Insects in Amber 28
- Plant and animal studies 26
- Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny 12
- Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution 7
- Genetics 23
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy 20
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 3
- Co-authors
- Alan N. Andersen (1 shared paper)G. McDonald (1 shared paper)R. A. Farrow (1 shared paper)Qiao Wang (1 shared paper)Jerome Whitfield (1 shared paper)Shoei‐Sheng Lee (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian Journal of Zoology (16 papers)Papers and proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania (1 paper)Revista Brasileira de Entomologia (1 paper)Australian entomologist (4 papers)The Victorian naturalist (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
TR New
43 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 328
- Insect Science 72
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 57
- Ecological Modeling 17
- Genetics 80
Countries citing papers authored by TR New
This map shows the geographic impact of TR New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by TR New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TR New more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by TR New
This network shows the impact of papers produced by TR New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by TR New. The network helps show where TR New may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside TR New, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 34 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 32 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1979 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 7 |
About TR New
TR New is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecology, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fossil Insects in Amber (28 papers), Plant and animal studies (26 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (20 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (12 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (328 citations), Insect Science (72 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (57 citations), Ecological Modeling (17 citations) and Genetics (80 citations). Frequent co-authors include Alan N. Andersen, G. McDonald, R. A. Farrow, Qiao Wang, Jerome Whitfield and Shoei‐Sheng Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Zoology, Papers and proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, Australian entomologist and The Victorian naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.