Toni Pikoos

416 citations
16 papers · 229 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Toni Pikoos

14 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Toni Pikoos
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Clinical Psychology 165
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 28
  • Cultural Studies 17
  • Neurology 15
Replace David Lomas with:
David Lomas United Kingdom
Volker Roelcke Germany
Nicola Luckhurst
Dahai Wang China
César Botella France
John C. Spurlock United States
Sára Botella France
Sandra A. Birtchnell United Kingdom
Yanyan Zhou United States
Riccardo Steiner India
Toni Pikoos relative to David Lomas United Kingdom David Lomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
David Lomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Toni Pikoos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Toni Pikoos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toni Pikoos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toni Pikoos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Toni Pikoos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toni Pikoos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toni Pikoos. The network helps show where Toni Pikoos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Toni Pikoos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Toni Pikoos Line = papers co-authored together Toni Pikoos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202160
2 202039
3 202129
4 202027
5 202115
6 202114
7 202014
8 202112
9 202111
10 20214
11 20241
12 20241
13 20241
14 20241
15 20240
16 20260

About Toni Pikoos

Toni Pikoos is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (14 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper) and Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (165 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (28 citations), Cultural Studies (17 citations) and Neurology (15 citations). Toni Pikoos has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susan L. Rossell, Simone Buzwell, Gemma Sharp, David Castle, Peter Bosanac, Sally Grace, Izelle Labuschagne, Wei Lin Toh, Michael Somenek and Simon Rice. Their work appears in journals such as Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, International Journal of Eating Disorders and Psychiatry Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact