Ton Storcken
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Safety Research top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hans PetersBettina KlausLars EhlersWalter BossertHerman MonsuurSouvik RoyArunava SenBezalel Peleg
- Topics
- Game Theory and Voting Systems (40 papers)Game Theory and Applications (18 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (16 papers)
- Cited by
- General Decision SciencesManagement Science and Operations ResearchEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Ton Storcken
40 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Economics and Econometrics 360
- Management Science and Operations Research 285
- Artificial Intelligence 67
- Safety Research 59
- General Decision Sciences 57
Countries citing papers authored by Ton Storcken
This map shows the geographic impact of Ton Storcken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ton Storcken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ton Storcken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ton Storcken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ton Storcken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ton Storcken. The network helps show where Ton Storcken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ton Storcken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ton Storcken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ton Storcken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ton Storcken. Ton Storcken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Collective Choice Rules on Convex Restricted Domains | 2 |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Arrow's Theorem in Spatial Environments | 5 |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Ton Storcken
Ton Storcken is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (40 papers), Game Theory and Applications (18 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (57 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (285 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (360 citations). Ton Storcken has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hans Peters, Bettina Klaus, Lars Ehlers, Walter Bossert, Herman Monsuur, Souvik Roy, Arunava Sen, Bezalel Peleg, Peter Borm and H.C.M. de Swart. Their work appears in journals such as Operations Research, Journal of Economic Theory and Economics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.