Tomotaka Shindo
- Gastroenterology top 1%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Physiology
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Seiji FutagamiChoitsu SakamotoKatya GudisTetsuro KawagoeAkane HorieMayumi ShimpukuKatsuhiko IwakiriKazumasa Miyake
- Topics
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (16 papers)Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (11 papers)Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Tomotaka Shindo
28 papers receiving 565 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Gastroenterology 371
- Surgery 359
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 78
- Physiology 57
- Molecular Biology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Tomotaka Shindo
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomotaka Shindo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomotaka Shindo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomotaka Shindo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomotaka Shindo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomotaka Shindo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomotaka Shindo. The network helps show where Tomotaka Shindo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomotaka Shindo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomotaka Shindo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomotaka Shindo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tomotaka Shindo. Tomotaka Shindo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | Implication of antithrombotic agents on potential bleeding from endoscopically determined peptic ulcers, incidentally detected as surrogate markers for NSAIDS-associated ulcers complication | 1 |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 104 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 94 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Tomotaka Shindo
Tomotaka Shindo is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (16 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (11 papers) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (371 citations), Surgery (359 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (34 citations). Tomotaka Shindo has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Seiji Futagami, Choitsu Sakamoto, Katya Gudis, Tetsuro Kawagoe, Akane Horie, Mayumi Shimpuku, Katsuhiko Iwakiri, Kazumasa Miyake, Taku Tsukui and Nobue Ueki. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.