Tomasz Cetner

1.2k citations
40 papers · 450 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tomasz Cetner

39 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Tomasz Cetner
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Condensed Matter Physics 410
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 257
  • Biomaterials 63
  • Materials Chemistry 117
  • Accounting 22
Replace Daniel Gajda with:
Daniel Gajda Poland
Yongchang Liu China
M. Bhatia United States
Wenbin Qiu Australia
S. Bohnenstiehl United States
C. Beneduce Switzerland
M. Burdusel Romania
Shinya Ueda Japan
T. Cavallin Italy
B. J. Senkowicz United States
Tomasz Cetner relative to Daniel Gajda Poland Daniel Gajda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel Gajda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomasz Cetner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomasz Cetner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomasz Cetner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomasz Cetner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomasz Cetner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomasz Cetner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomasz Cetner. The network helps show where Tomasz Cetner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomasz Cetner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomasz Cetner Line = papers co-authored together Tomasz Cetner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201551
2 201424
3 201723
4 201623
5 201522
6 201321
7 201721
8 201620
9 201619
10 201619
11 201717
12 201217
13 201517
14 201116
15 202115
16 201815
17 201613
18 201813
19 20159
20 20208

About Tomasz Cetner

Tomasz Cetner is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Accounting, Biomedical Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (30 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (28 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (28 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (5 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (4 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (410 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (257 citations), Biomaterials (63 citations), Materials Chemistry (117 citations) and Accounting (22 citations). Tomasz Cetner has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include A. Morawski, Daniel Gajda, A. Zaleski, M. Rindfleisch, Md. Shahriar A. Hossain, Matthew Rindfleisch, M. Tomsic, R. Diduszko, A. Presz and Fırat Karaboğa. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Scripta Materialia and Ceramics International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact