Daniel Gajda

980 total citations
81 papers, 822 citations indexed

About

Daniel Gajda is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Gajda has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 822 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 44 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 16 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Daniel Gajda's work include Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (68 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (57 papers) and Iron-based superconductors research (39 papers). Daniel Gajda is often cited by papers focused on Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (68 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (57 papers) and Iron-based superconductors research (39 papers). Daniel Gajda collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Türkiye. Daniel Gajda's co-authors include A. Morawski, A. Zaleski, Tomasz Cetner, Md. Shahriar A. Hossain, M. Rindfleisch, İ. Belenli, Fırat Karaboğa, Mustafa Akdoğan, Matthew Rindfleisch and M. Małecka and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Gajda

76 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Gajda Poland 19 741 425 206 133 122 81 822
Matthew Rindfleisch United States 17 863 1.2× 408 1.0× 197 1.0× 141 1.1× 207 1.7× 44 921
Yongchang Liu China 17 646 0.9× 231 0.5× 315 1.5× 169 1.3× 90 0.7× 59 683
C Rodig Germany 14 501 0.7× 274 0.6× 208 1.0× 93 0.7× 59 0.5× 30 581
Tomasz Cetner Poland 16 410 0.6× 257 0.6× 117 0.6× 63 0.5× 48 0.4× 40 450
V. Ferrando Italy 15 563 0.8× 351 0.8× 176 0.9× 93 0.7× 28 0.2× 34 627
M. Bhatia United States 17 855 1.2× 396 0.9× 228 1.1× 125 0.9× 161 1.3× 27 880
M. Burdusel Romania 12 240 0.3× 133 0.3× 192 0.9× 36 0.3× 37 0.3× 52 376
T. Cavallin Italy 10 217 0.3× 189 0.4× 244 1.2× 35 0.3× 62 0.5× 22 430
E. Wertz United States 9 377 0.5× 278 0.7× 226 1.1× 51 0.4× 71 0.6× 12 533
D.Q. Shi Australia 15 497 0.7× 219 0.5× 296 1.4× 54 0.4× 34 0.3× 40 591

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gajda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gajda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gajda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gajda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gajda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gajda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gajda. The network helps show where Daniel Gajda may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Gajda

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Gajda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Gajda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Gajda. Daniel Gajda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Karaboğa, Fırat, et al.. (2025). A new structural design to improve Mg diffusion in IMD MgB2 wires. Superconductor Science and Technology. 38(6). 65006–65006.
2.
Ćwik, J., Yu. S. Koshkid’ko, Piotr Putyra, et al.. (2024). Layered composite magnetic refrigerants for hydrogen liquefaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 87. 485–494. 30 indexed citations
3.
Gajda, Daniel, Michał Babij, A. Zaleski, & M. Rindfleisch. (2024). Influence of the interfacial topological effect on the behavior of transport current in MgB2 material in the Meissner state and mixed state. Journal of Applied Physics. 136(22).
5.
Gajda, Daniel, Michał Babij, A. Zaleski, et al.. (2024). The influence of Sm2O3 dopant on structure, morphology and transport critical current density of MgB2 wires investigated by using the transmission electron microscope. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys. 12(12). 5061–5078. 3 indexed citations
6.
Маширов, А. В., V. V. Koledov, А. П. Орлов, et al.. (2024). Solenoid based on tapes of high-temperature superconductor for magnetocaloric applications. Journal of Radio Electronics. 2024(11).
8.
Gajda, Daniel, Michał Babij, Fırat Karaboğa, et al.. (2023). Optimized superconducting MgB2 joint made by IMD technique. Superconductor Science and Technology. 36(7). 75004–75004. 5 indexed citations
9.
Morawski, A., et al.. (2022). Superconducting Properties and Microstructure Changes after Heat Treatment of In Situ MgB2 Wires with Ex Situ MgB2 Barriers. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 35(6). 1491–1497. 3 indexed citations
10.
Gajda, Daniel, A. Zaleski, A. Morawski, et al.. (2022). Influence of annealing temperature and isostatic pressure on microstructure and superconducting properties of isotopic Mg11B2 wires fabricated by internal Mg diffusion method. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 933. 167660–167660. 3 indexed citations
11.
Qiu, Wenbin, Daniel Gajda, Jeonghun Kim, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of residual stress and texture in isotope based Mg11B2superconductor using neutron diffraction. RSC Advances. 8(69). 39455–39462. 3 indexed citations
12.
Zaleski, A., et al.. (2018). The Influence of High Isostatic Pressure on Critical Current Density in C-Doped MgB2 Wires. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 32(5). 1205–1212. 1 indexed citations
13.
Zaleski, A., et al.. (2018). The Impact of High Pressure, Doping and the Size of Crystalline Boron Grains on Creation of High-Field Pinning Centers in In Situ MgB2 Wires. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 32(4). 845–853. 4 indexed citations
14.
Patel, Dipak, Wenbin Qiu, Mislav Mustapić, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of a solid nitrogen impregnated MgB2 racetrack coil. Superconductor Science and Technology. 31(10). 105010–105010. 23 indexed citations
15.
Gajda, Daniel & A. Morawski. (2016). Evidence of Point Pinning Centers in Un-Doped Mgb2 Wires at 20 K after HIP Process. Journal of Material Science & Engineering. 5(3). 3 indexed citations
16.
Gajda, Daniel. (2014). Rola innowacji w modelach biznesu. Silesian Digital Library (Silesian Library). 61–73. 2 indexed citations
17.
Woźniak, Mariusz, et al.. (2013). Optimization of the copper addition to the core ofin situCu-sheathed MgB2wires. Superconductor Science and Technology. 26(10). 105008–105008. 23 indexed citations
18.
Gajda, Daniel, A. Morawski, A. Zaleski, Tomasz Cetner, & A. Presz. (2011). Enhancement of critical current density in superconducting wires NbTi. PRZEGLĄD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY. 209–213. 3 indexed citations
19.
Gajda, Daniel, A. Morawski, A. Presz, & A. Zaleski. (2009). Extremely positive effect of the cold drawing on critical current density of the SKNT- 8910 NbTi wire. PRZEGLĄD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY. 208–211. 2 indexed citations
20.
Beloshenko, V. А., T. E. Konstantinova, Daniel Gajda, et al.. (2009). Equal-Channel Multi-Angle Pressing Effect on the Properties of NbTi Alloy. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism. 22(5). 505–510. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026