Daniel Gajda

980 citations
81 papers · 822 indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Gajda

76 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Daniel Gajda
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Condensed Matter Physics 741
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 425
  • Biomaterials 133
  • Materials Chemistry 206
  • Biomedical Engineering 122
Replace Matthew Rindfleisch with:
Matthew Rindfleisch United States
Yongchang Liu China
M. Bhatia United States
C Rodig Germany
Tomasz Cetner Poland
V. Ferrando Italy
M. Burdusel Romania
T. Cavallin Italy
S. Roncallo United Kingdom
E. Wertz United States
Daniel Gajda relative to Matthew Rindfleisch United States Matthew Rindfleisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Matthew Rindfleisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gajda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gajda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gajda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gajda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gajda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gajda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gajda. The network helps show where Daniel Gajda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gajda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gajda Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gajda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201551
2 202430
3 201627
4 201424
5 201323
6 201823
7 201723
8 201623
9 201523
10 201522
11 201721
12 201721
13 201321
14 201721
15 201520
16 201620
17 201619
18 201619
19 200718
20 201717

About Daniel Gajda

Daniel Gajda is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomaterials, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 81 papers that have together received 822 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (68 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (57 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (39 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (15 papers), Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (13 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers), Hydrogen Storage and Materials (5 papers) and Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (741 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (425 citations), Biomaterials (133 citations), Materials Chemistry (206 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (122 citations). Daniel Gajda has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include A. Morawski, A. Zaleski, Tomasz Cetner, Md. Shahriar A. Hossain, M. Rindfleisch, İ. Belenli, Fırat Karaboğa, Mustafa Akdoğan, M. Małecka and Matthew Rindfleisch. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Journal of Applied Physics, Materials and Scripta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026