Tomáš Vrška
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 33
-
- Forest ecology and management 23
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 9
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Forest Management and Policy 7
- Space and Planetary Science top 5%
- Environmental Engineering top 2%
- Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications 6
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology 14
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 10
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 7
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Tomáš Vrška
47 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Insect Science 1.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 922
- Global and Planetary Change 601
- Space and Planetary Science 34
- Environmental Engineering 375
Countries citing papers authored by Tomáš Vrška
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomáš Vrška's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomáš Vrška with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomáš Vrška more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomáš Vrška
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomáš Vrška. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomáš Vrška. The network helps show where Tomáš Vrška may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomáš Vrška, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 125 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 86 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 162 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 115 | |
| 11 | Bryophytes associated with two tree species and different stages of decay in a natural fir-beech mixed forest in the Czech Republic | 2015 | 22 |
| 12 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 13 | The Pinus rotundata Link bog forests on mined peat bogs - is the conservation of undisturbed edge an effective tool for its protection? | 2012 | 1 |
| 14 | 2011 | 53 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 125 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 18 | Polom virgin forest after 22 years (1973-1995). | 2000 | 4 |
| 19 | Mionší virgin forest - historical development and present situation. | 2000 | 11 |
| 20 | Diana Nature Reserve | 1996 | 1 |
About Tomáš Vrška
Tomáš Vrška is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (33 papers), Forest ecology and management (23 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (14 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (7 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (922 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (601 citations). Tomáš Vrška has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Kamil Král, Pavel Šamonil, David Janík, Dušan Adam, Libor Hort, Martin Krůček, Pavel Unar, Jurij Diaci, Jan Trochta and Petr Baldrián. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Plant and Soil.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.