Tomas Furmark
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 21
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 82
- Mental Health Research Topics 30
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 16
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 19
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 18
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 14
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 26
Tomas Furmark
130 papers receiving 7.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Applied Psychology 1.7k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.3k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 614
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
- Clinical Psychology 2.9k
Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Furmark
This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Furmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Furmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Furmark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Furmark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Furmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Furmark. The network helps show where Tomas Furmark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomas Furmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 127 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 9 | Interrelated Functional and Structural Amygdala Plasticity Following Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder | 2015 | 3 |
| 10 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 256 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 147 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 54 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 63 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 191 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 171 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 91 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 75 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 134 |
About Tomas Furmark
Tomas Furmark is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 8.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (82 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (30 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (26 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (19 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (18 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (16 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (614 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.9k citations). Tomas Furmark has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Maria Tillfors, Gerhard Andersson, Mats Fredrikson, Per Carlbring, Håkan Fischer, Ína Marteinsdóttir, Mats Fredrikson, Lisa Ekselius, Bengt Långström and Andreas Frick. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy, PLoS ONE, Biological Psychiatry and Behavioural Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.