Tom W. Reader

66 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy 2014 · 280 citations
280201420262018202250100150200250

Peers

Tom W. Reader
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 736
  • Pharmacy 483
  • Emergency Medical Services 576
  • Family Practice 159
  • Health Information Management 292
Replace René Amalberti with:
René Amalberti France
Carl Macrae United Kingdom
Robyn Clay‐Williams Australia
Karina Aase Norway
Sallie J. Weaver United States
Tanja Manser Switzerland
Mats Brommels Sweden
Siri Wiig Norway
Paul E. Plsek United States
Joanne Travaglia Australia
Tom W. Reader relative to René Amalberti France René Amalberti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
René Amalberti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom W. Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom W. Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom W. Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom W. Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom W. Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom W. Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom W. Reader. The network helps show where Tom W. Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom W. Reader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom W. Reader Line = papers co-authored together Tom W. Reader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy
Hit paper breakdown →
2014280
2 2006203
3 2009193
4 2007146
5 2016139
6 2013115
7 2007111
8 201999
9 202194
10 201684
11 201682
12 201868
13 201366
14 201564
15 201264
16 202057
17 201557
18 201143
19 202141
20 201141

About Tom W. Reader

Tom W. Reader is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Pharmacy, Family Practice, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (33 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (19 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (17 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (16 papers), Safety Warnings and Signage (10 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (9 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (736 citations), Pharmacy (483 citations), Emergency Medical Services (576 citations), Family Practice (159 citations) and Health Information Management (292 citations). Tom W. Reader has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alex Gillespie, Brian H. Cuthbertson, Rhona Flin, Kathryn Mearns, Jane Roberts, Mark C. Noort, Barry Kirwan, Kristina Lauche, Steven Shorrock and Stephen J. Brett. Their work appears in journals such as Safety Science, BMJ Quality & Safety, Journal of Risk Research, Risk Analysis and Current Opinion in Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026