Tom Van Caneghem

874 total citations
40 papers, 605 citations indexed

About

Tom Van Caneghem is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Van Caneghem has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 605 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Accounting, 17 papers in Strategy and Management and 10 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Tom Van Caneghem's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (28 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (12 papers). Tom Van Caneghem is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (28 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (12 papers). Tom Van Caneghem collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and France. Tom Van Caneghem's co-authors include Geert Van Campenhout, Anne‐Mie Reheul, Sandra Verbruggen, Walter Aerts, Johan Christiaens, Marleen Willekens, Gerrit Sarens and Maria Roszkowska‐Menkes and has published in prestigious journals such as Small Business Economics, Scientometrics and Journal of Economic Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Tom Van Caneghem

37 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Van Caneghem Belgium 13 485 180 109 99 71 40 605
Christopher J. Skousen United States 13 550 1.1× 348 1.9× 71 0.7× 42 0.4× 72 1.0× 34 765
Ning Gao United Kingdom 12 554 1.1× 187 1.0× 362 3.3× 236 2.4× 44 0.6× 42 807
William L. Felix United States 8 568 1.2× 131 0.7× 62 0.6× 34 0.3× 40 0.6× 13 638
Joanne Horton United Kingdom 15 986 2.0× 464 2.6× 385 3.5× 147 1.5× 34 0.5× 35 1.1k
Christian Schumacher Austria 11 98 0.2× 112 0.6× 97 0.9× 228 2.3× 21 0.3× 21 516
Suresh Govindaraj United States 9 670 1.4× 233 1.3× 421 3.9× 146 1.5× 60 0.8× 32 913
Zahn Bozanic United States 14 1.1k 2.2× 256 1.4× 481 4.4× 301 3.0× 119 1.7× 37 1.3k
Nadya Malenko United States 14 632 1.3× 183 1.0× 306 2.8× 136 1.4× 26 0.4× 33 788
Nikolaos I. Papanikolaou United Kingdom 8 360 0.7× 199 1.1× 381 3.5× 194 2.0× 19 0.3× 19 669
Nerissa C. Brown United States 13 711 1.5× 213 1.2× 456 4.2× 195 2.0× 90 1.3× 28 924

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Van Caneghem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Van Caneghem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Van Caneghem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Van Caneghem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Van Caneghem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Van Caneghem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Van Caneghem. The network helps show where Tom Van Caneghem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Van Caneghem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Van Caneghem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Van Caneghem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Van Caneghem. Tom Van Caneghem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Reheul, Anne‐Mie & Tom Van Caneghem. (2024). To comply, or not to comply: the question is why. European Journal of Law and Economics. 58(1). 21–46. 1 indexed citations
3.
Caneghem, Tom Van, et al.. (2022). Mandatory Financial Statements Disclosure and Nonprofits’ Debt Structure: An Empirical Analysis. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 34(4). 787–798. 3 indexed citations
4.
Aerts, Walter, et al.. (2021). Value relevance of peer-based benchmarking of discretionary expenses and business strategy. Applied Economics. 53(32). 3694–3714. 2 indexed citations
5.
Caneghem, Tom Van. (2015). NPO Financial Statement Quality: An Empirical Analysis Based on Benford’s Law. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 27(6). 2685–2708. 9 indexed citations
6.
Caneghem, Tom Van, et al.. (2015). Financial statement filing lags: An empirical analysis among small firms. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship. 34(4). 506–531. 34 indexed citations
7.
Verbruggen, Sandra, Johan Christiaens, Anne‐Mie Reheul, & Tom Van Caneghem. (2014). Analysis of Audit Fees for Nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 44(4). 734–754. 20 indexed citations
8.
Caneghem, Tom Van, et al.. (2013). Can Auditors Mitigate Information Asymmetry in M&As? An Empirical Analysis of the Method of Payment in Belgian Transactions. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 33(1). 57–91. 15 indexed citations
9.
Reheul, Anne‐Mie, Tom Van Caneghem, & Sandra Verbruggen. (2012). Financial Reporting Lags in the Non-profit Sector: An Empirical Analysis. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 25(2). 352–377. 31 indexed citations
10.
Verbruggen, Sandra, et al.. (2011). Het bedrijfsrevisoraat in de verenigingssector. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1 indexed citations
11.
Aerts, Walter & Tom Van Caneghem. (2011). Trait‐based conformity in reporting of selling, general and administrative expenses. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 7(2). 108–131. 4 indexed citations
12.
Caneghem, Tom Van & Geert Van Campenhout. (2009). Information Availability, Information Quality and the Financial Structure of Belgian SMEs. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
13.
Caneghem, Tom Van. (2009). Audit pricing and the Big4 fee premium: evidence from Belgium. Managerial Auditing Journal. 25(2). 122–139. 47 indexed citations
14.
Caneghem, Tom Van. (2008). Psychological Pricing: Private vs. Professional Vendors. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 53(4). 475–489. 1 indexed citations
15.
Campenhout, Geert Van, et al.. (2008). A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature. Scientometrics. 77(1). 61–90. 5 indexed citations
16.
Aerts, Walter, Geert Van Campenhout, & Tom Van Caneghem. (2007). Clustering in dividends: Do managers rely on cognitive reference points?. Journal of Economic Psychology. 29(3). 276–284. 17 indexed citations
17.
Caneghem, Tom Van. (2004). The Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Rounding-up Behaviour: Some U.K. Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
18.
Caneghem, Tom Van. (2004). The impact of audit quality on earnings rounding-up behaviour: some UK evidence. European Accounting Review. 13(4). 771–786. 63 indexed citations
19.
Campenhout, Geert Van, et al.. (2002). Financial statement information and the prédiction of stock returns in a small capital market: the case of Belgium. Lirias (KU Leuven). 45(3). 65–90. 1 indexed citations
20.
Caneghem, Tom Van. (2002). EARNINGS MANAGEMENT INDUCED BY COGNITIVE REFERENCE POINTS. The British Accounting Review. 34(2). 167–178. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026