Tom P. Flower

1.3k citations
21 papers · 768 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Tom P. Flower

21 papers receiving 756 citations

Peers

Tom P. Flower
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Developmental Biology 162
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 566
  • Ecology 403
  • Social Psychology 152
  • Genetics 151
Replace Frédérique Dubois with:
Frédérique Dubois Canada
Daniela Canestrari Spain
Laura A. Kelley United Kingdom
Michael N. Weiss United Kingdom
Markus Zöttl Sweden
Thijs van Overveld Belgium
Karen M. Bouwman Netherlands
Claudia Mettke‐Hofmann United Kingdom
Adriana A. Maldonado‐Chaparro Germany
Elizabeth A. Hobson United States
Tom P. Flower relative to Frédérique Dubois Canada Frédérique Dubois's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frédérique Dubois · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom P. Flower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom P. Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom P. Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom P. Flower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom P. Flower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom P. Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom P. Flower. The network helps show where Tom P. Flower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom P. Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom P. Flower Line = papers co-authored together Tom P. Flower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007116
2 201094
3 200890
4 201082
5 201478
6 201272
7 201842
8 200937
9 200731
10 201225
11 201416
12 201814
13 202013
14 201613
15 201813
16 201211
17 201111
18 20105
19 20213
20 20121

About Tom P. Flower

Tom P. Flower is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Social Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (2 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (162 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (566 citations), Ecology (403 citations), Social Psychology (152 citations) and Genetics (151 citations). Tom P. Flower has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tim Clutton‐Brock, Sarah J. Hodge, Amanda R. Ridley, Matthew O. Gribble, Andrea Manica, Andrew J. Young, Martha J. Nelson‐Flower, Göran Spong, Elizabeth M. Wiley and Alex Thornton. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Behaviour, Journal of Animal Ecology, Behavioral Ecology, Bird Conservation International and Molecular Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact