Rose Thorogood

1.6k total citations
59 papers, 910 citations indexed

About

Rose Thorogood is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Developmental Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rose Thorogood has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 910 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 24 papers in Ecology and 9 papers in Developmental Biology. Recurrent topics in Rose Thorogood's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (31 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (17 papers). Rose Thorogood is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (31 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (17 papers). Rose Thorogood collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and New Zealand. Rose Thorogood's co-authors include Nicholas B. Davies, John G. Ewen, Filiz Karadaş, Johanna Mappes, Rebecca M. Kilner, Hannah M. Rowland, Doug P. Armstrong, Phillip Cassey, Kevin N. Laland and Luke Rendell and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Rose Thorogood

56 papers receiving 894 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rose Thorogood United Kingdom	17	600	485	139	111	103	59	910
Daniela Canestrari Spain	19	842 1.4×	600 1.2×	145 1.0×	161 1.5×	79 0.8×	42	1.1k
Peter Korsten Netherlands	21	857 1.4×	560 1.2×	89 0.6×	271 2.4×	98 1.0×	41	1.2k
José M. Marcos Spain	18	712 1.2×	512 1.1×	111 0.8×	128 1.2×	61 0.6×	24	878
Thijs van Overveld Belgium	16	773 1.3×	572 1.2×	129 0.9×	128 1.2×	58 0.6×	25	989
Markus Zöttl Sweden	20	577 1.0×	419 0.9×	80 0.6×	164 1.5×	33 0.3×	40	893
Stuart P. Sharp United Kingdom	20	903 1.5×	843 1.7×	214 1.5×	232 2.1×	115 1.1×	51	1.4k
Nicholas B. Davies United Kingdom	17	882 1.5×	903 1.9×	220 1.6×	231 2.1×	172 1.7×	19	1.3k
Christina Riehl United States	18	697 1.2×	459 0.9×	118 0.8×	217 2.0×	42 0.4×	52	981
Margret I. Hatch United States	13	498 0.8×	450 0.9×	69 0.5×	82 0.7×	86 0.8×	20	735
Karen M. Bouwman Netherlands	14	702 1.2×	476 1.0×	108 0.8×	149 1.3×	53 0.5×	18	880

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Thorogood

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Thorogood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Thorogood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Thorogood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Thorogood

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Thorogood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Thorogood. The network helps show where Rose Thorogood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rose Thorogood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rose Thorogood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rose Thorogood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rose Thorogood. Rose Thorogood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kluen, Edward, Staffan Bensch, Fabrice Eroukhmanoff, et al.. (2025). Combined Evidence Reveals the Origin of a Rapid Range Expansion Despite Retained Genetic Diversity and a Weak Founder Effect. Molecular Ecology. 34(19). e70077–e70077.

Cardoso, Pedro, et al.. (2025). Insect-associated bacterial communities across an anthropogenic landscape. mSphere. 10(9). e0032025–e0032025.

Rönkä, Katja, Fabrice Eroukhmanoff, Jonna Kulmuni, Pierre Nouhaud, & Rose Thorogood. (2024). Beyond genes‐for‐behaviour: The potential for genomics to resolve long‐standing questions in avian brood parasitism. Ecology and Evolution. 14(11). 1–20. 3 indexed citations

Kluen, Edward, et al.. (2024). Changing Bird Migration Patterns Have Potential to Enhance Dispersal of Alien Plants From Urban Centres. Global Change Biology. 30(11). e17572–e17572. 1 indexed citations

Rönkä, Katja, et al.. (2024). How, why, where and when people feed birds?—Spatio‐temporal changes in bird‐feeding in Finland. People and Nature. 7(2). 360–372. 2 indexed citations

Thorogood, Rose, et al.. (2023). Parental breeding decisions and genetic quality predict social structure of independent offspring. Molecular Ecology. 32(17). 4898–4910. 1 indexed citations

Lever, David, et al.. (2022). Darwin's small and medium ground finches might have taste preferences, but not for human foods. Royal Society Open Science. 9(1). 211198–211198. 1 indexed citations

Thorogood, Rose, et al.. (2022). Social information use about novel aposematic prey depends on the intensity of the observed cue. Behavioral Ecology. 33(4). 825–832. 3 indexed citations

Thorogood, Rose, et al.. (2022). Snow depth drives habitat selection by overwintering birds in built‐up areas, farmlands and forests. Journal of Biogeography. 49(4). 630–639. 10 indexed citations

10.

Eroukhmanoff, Fabrice, Katja Rönkä, Edward Kluen, et al.. (2021). A Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of the Reed Warbler ( Acrocephalus scirpaceus ). Genome Biology and Evolution. 13(9). 5 indexed citations

11.

Rowland, Hannah M., et al.. (2021). Social information use by predators: expanding the information ecology of prey defences. Oikos. 2022(10). 11 indexed citations

12.

Hoppitt, William, et al.. (2021). Social transmission in the wild can reduce predation pressure on novel prey signals. Nature Communications. 12(1). 3978–3978. 17 indexed citations

13.

Thorogood, Rose, et al.. (2020). Seeing red? Colour biases of foraging birds are context dependent. Animal Cognition. 23(5). 1007–1018. 10 indexed citations

14.

Mappes, Johanna, et al.. (2020). Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89(5). 1153–1164. 30 indexed citations

15.

Ewen, John G., et al.. (2019). Changes in social groups across reintroductions and effects on post‐release survival. Animal Conservation. 23(4). 443–454. 24 indexed citations

16.

Rowland, Hannah M., et al.. (2019). The effect of social information from live demonstrators compared to video playback on blue tit foraging decisions. PeerJ. 7. e7998–e7998. 4 indexed citations

17.

Mappes, Johanna, et al.. (2019). Social information use about novel aposematic prey is not influenced by a predator's previous experience with toxins. Functional Ecology. 33(10). 1982–1992. 12 indexed citations

18.

Mappes, Johanna, et al.. (2019). Predators’ consumption of unpalatable prey does not vary as a function of bitter taste perception. Behavioral Ecology. 31(2). 383–392. 12 indexed citations

19.

Armstrong, Doug P., Isabel Castro, John K. Perrott, John G. Ewen, & Rose Thorogood. (2010). Impacts of pathogenic disease and native predators on threatened native species. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 34(2). 272–273. 2 indexed citations

20.

Thorogood, Rose, Dianne H. Brunton, & Isabel Castro. (2009). Simple techniques for sexing nestling hihi ( Notiomystis cincta ) in the field. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 36(2). 115–121. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact