Frédérique Dubois

1.5k total citations
46 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Frédérique Dubois is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frédérique Dubois has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Frédérique Dubois's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (31 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (19 papers) and Plant and animal studies (17 papers). Frédérique Dubois is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (31 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (19 papers) and Plant and animal studies (17 papers). Frédérique Dubois collaborates with scholars based in Canada, France and United Kingdom. Frédérique Dubois's co-authors include Frank Cézilly, Luc‐Alain Giraldeau, Mark Pagel, Louis Lefebvre, Laure Cauchard, Blandine Doligez, Neeltje J. Boogert, Julie Morand‐Ferron, Sarah E. Overington and M Préault and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Frédérique Dubois

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frédérique Dubois Canada 18 791 432 222 194 162 46 1.1k
Daizaburo Shizuka United States 21 984 1.2× 536 1.2× 392 1.8× 242 1.2× 301 1.9× 55 1.4k
Christina Riehl United States 18 697 0.9× 459 1.1× 214 1.0× 217 1.1× 118 0.7× 52 981
Matthew B. V. Bell United Kingdom 22 886 1.1× 515 1.2× 257 1.2× 150 0.8× 388 2.4× 36 1.2k
Camilla A. Hinde United Kingdom 21 1.2k 1.6× 754 1.7× 271 1.2× 188 1.0× 356 2.2× 34 1.6k
Safi K. Darden United Kingdom 19 699 0.9× 456 1.1× 299 1.3× 191 1.0× 213 1.3× 38 1.1k
Markus Zöttl Sweden 20 577 0.7× 419 1.0× 169 0.8× 167 0.9× 80 0.5× 40 893
Ralph Bergmüller Switzerland 14 1.0k 1.3× 357 0.8× 342 1.5× 411 2.1× 121 0.7× 14 1.4k
Isabelle Coolen France 9 587 0.7× 173 0.4× 119 0.5× 210 1.1× 99 0.6× 9 774
Julia Schroeder United Kingdom 23 935 1.2× 902 2.1× 163 0.7× 68 0.4× 210 1.3× 70 1.6k
Anne A. Carlson United States 16 601 0.8× 420 1.0× 410 1.8× 86 0.4× 101 0.6× 24 994

Countries citing papers authored by Frédérique Dubois

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédérique Dubois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédérique Dubois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédérique Dubois more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédérique Dubois

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédérique Dubois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédérique Dubois. The network helps show where Frédérique Dubois may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédérique Dubois

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédérique Dubois. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédérique Dubois based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frédérique Dubois. Frédérique Dubois is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Dubois, Frédérique. (2024). Game theory elucidates how competitive dynamics mediate animal social networks. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 24(1). 116–116.
3.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2020). Do female zebra finches prefer males exhibiting greater plasticity in foraging tactic use?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 74(9). 6 indexed citations
4.
Aubin‐Horth, Nadia, et al.. (2018). Are some individuals generally more behaviorally plastic than others? An experiment with sailfin mollies. PeerJ. 6. e5454–e5454. 4 indexed citations
5.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2017). Impulsiveness does not prevent cooperation from emerging but reduces its occurrence: an experiment with zebra finches. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 8544–8544. 2 indexed citations
6.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2016). Male foraging efficiency, but not male problem-solving performance, influences female mating preferences in zebra finches. PeerJ. 4. e2409–e2409. 12 indexed citations
7.
Dubois, Frédérique. (2014). When being the centre of the attention is detrimental: copiers may favour the use of evasive tactics. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 69(2). 183–191. 5 indexed citations
8.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2012). Individual differences in sampling behaviour predict social information use in zebra finches. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 66(9). 1259–1265. 40 indexed citations
9.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2012). Audience Effect Alters Male Mating Preferences in Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata). PLoS ONE. 7(8). e43697–e43697. 17 indexed citations
10.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2011). Neighbours' Breeding Success and the Sex Ratio of Their Offspring Affect the Mate Preferences of Female Zebra Finches. PLoS ONE. 6(12). e29737–e29737. 4 indexed citations
11.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2009). Profil clinique et psychopathologique des femmes victimes de violences conjugales psychologiques. Revue d Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique. 57(4). 267–274. 11 indexed citations
12.
Dubois, Frédérique, et al.. (2008). Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 63(2). 269–276. 27 indexed citations
13.
Overington, Sarah E., Frédérique Dubois, & Louis Lefebvre. (2008). Food unpredictability drives both generalism and social foraging: a game theoretical model. Behavioral Ecology. 19(4). 836–841. 42 indexed citations
14.
Dubois, Frédérique. (2007). Mate choice copying in monogamous species: should females use public information to choose extrapair mates?. Animal Behaviour. 74(6). 1785–1793. 11 indexed citations
15.
Dubois, Frédérique, Luc‐Alain Giraldeau, Ian M. Hamilton, James W. A. Grant, & Louis Lefebvre. (2004). Distraction Sneakers Decrease the Expected Level of Aggression within Groups: A Game‐Theoretic Model. The American Naturalist. 164(2). E32–E45. 17 indexed citations
16.
Dubois, Frédérique. (2004). Fr?d?rique Dubois ?ric Wajnberg Frank C?zilly Optimal divorce and re-mating strategies for monogamous female birds: a simulation model. 1 indexed citations
17.
Dubois, Frédérique & Luc‐Alain Giraldeau. (2003). The Forager’s Dilemma: Food Sharing and Food Defense as Risk‐Sensitive Foraging Options. The American Naturalist. 162(6). 768–779. 26 indexed citations
18.
Dubois, Frédérique & Frank Cézilly. (2002). Breeding success and mate retention in birds: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 52(5). 357–364. 109 indexed citations
19.
Cézilly, Frank, Frédérique Dubois, & Mark Pagel. (2000). Is mate fidelity related to site fidelity? A comparative analysis in Ciconiiforms. Animal Behaviour. 59(6). 1143–1152. 85 indexed citations
20.
Dubois, Frédérique, Frank Cézilly, & Mark Pagel. (1998). Mate fidelity and coloniality in waterbirds: a comparative analysis. Oecologia. 116(3). 433–440. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026