Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations
2006759 citationsFrancisco C. Santos, Jorge M. Pacheco et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Lenaerts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Lenaerts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Lenaerts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Lenaerts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Lenaerts. The network helps show where Tom Lenaerts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Lenaerts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Lenaerts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Lenaerts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Lenaerts. Tom Lenaerts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barfuß, Wolfram, Jessica C. Flack, Chaitanya S. Gokhale, et al.. (2025). Collective cooperative intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(25). e2319948121–e2319948121.1 indexed citations
Pereira, Luı́s Moniz, Luis A. Martínez-Vaquero, & Tom Lenaerts. (2016). Guilt for Non-Humans. TeesRep (Teesside University). 249–252.1 indexed citations
Pereira, Luı́s Moniz, Francisco C. Santos, & Tom Lenaerts. (2013). Why is it so hard to say sorry? evolution of apology with commitments in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 177–183.15 indexed citations
15.
Spalevıć, Velibor, et al.. (2013). The impact of land use on soil erosion in the river basin Boljanska Rijeka in Montenegro. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 54–63.14 indexed citations
16.
Lenaerts, Tom, et al.. (2013). Evolution of common-pool resources and social welfare in structured populations. ORBi UMONS. 2848–2854.5 indexed citations
17.
Santos, Francisco C., Jorge M. Pacheco, & Tom Lenaerts. (2006). Emergence of Cooperation in Heterogeneous structured populations. Artificial Life. 432–437.1 indexed citations
18.
Tuyls, Karl, Tom Lenaerts, Katja Verbeeck, Sam Maes, & Bernard Manderick. (2002). Towards a relation between learning agents and evolutionary dynamics. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 315–322.7 indexed citations
19.
Lenaerts, Tom, et al.. (2002). Testing the overall functional robustness of 2D CA phenotypes for development. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 203–210.1 indexed citations
20.
Lenaerts, Tom, Sam Maes, Karl Tuyls, et al.. (2001). Niching and evolutionary transitions in multi-agent systems. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 309–312.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.