Tom Harcourt‐Brown

748 total citations
38 papers, 452 citations indexed

About

Tom Harcourt‐Brown is a scholar working on Surgery, Small Animals and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Harcourt‐Brown has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 452 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in Small Animals and 9 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Tom Harcourt‐Brown's work include Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (8 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (6 papers) and Veterinary Oncology Research (5 papers). Tom Harcourt‐Brown is often cited by papers focused on Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (8 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (6 papers) and Veterinary Oncology Research (5 papers). Tom Harcourt‐Brown collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Tom Harcourt‐Brown's co-authors include Nick D. Jeffery, Nicolas Granger, Hilary Z. Hu, Richard Lawn, Mickey Tivers, Sophie Adamantos, Michael Carter, Robert C. Fowkes, Victoria J. Lipscomb and John E. Parker and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and The Veterinary Journal.

In The Last Decade

Tom Harcourt‐Brown

35 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Harcourt‐Brown United Kingdom 13 160 145 91 66 63 38 452
Rita Gonçalves United Kingdom 15 198 1.2× 215 1.5× 107 1.2× 81 1.2× 69 1.1× 60 615
Benjamin D. Young United States 14 141 0.9× 144 1.0× 136 1.5× 81 1.2× 95 1.5× 32 579
Alberta De Stefani United Kingdom 15 181 1.1× 148 1.0× 67 0.7× 78 1.2× 73 1.2× 30 503
Elsa Beltrán United Kingdom 12 171 1.1× 160 1.1× 73 0.8× 105 1.6× 43 0.7× 54 494
Catherine Stalin United Kingdom 11 170 1.1× 151 1.0× 41 0.5× 56 0.8× 35 0.6× 26 328
Eric N. Glass United States 16 117 0.7× 145 1.0× 136 1.5× 58 0.9× 69 1.1× 52 594
Katia Marioni‐Henry United Kingdom 12 225 1.4× 102 0.7× 155 1.7× 86 1.3× 36 0.6× 32 512
Shannon P. Holmes United States 12 91 0.6× 122 0.8× 85 0.9× 32 0.5× 64 1.0× 41 523
Andy Shores United States 13 187 1.2× 171 1.2× 64 0.7× 127 1.9× 44 0.7× 29 414
Kiichi KANAYAMA Japan 12 112 0.7× 97 0.7× 97 1.1× 55 0.8× 48 0.8× 75 568

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Harcourt‐Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Harcourt‐Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Harcourt‐Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Harcourt‐Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Harcourt‐Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Harcourt‐Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Harcourt‐Brown. The network helps show where Tom Harcourt‐Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Harcourt‐Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Harcourt‐Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Harcourt‐Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Harcourt‐Brown. Tom Harcourt‐Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Driver, Colin, et al.. (2024). Prospective randomized trial comparing relapse rates in dogs with steroid-responsive meningitis-arteritis treated with a 6-week or 6-month prednisolone protocol. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 38(4). 2221–2227. 3 indexed citations
6.
Harcourt‐Brown, Tom & Michael Carter. (2023). Long-term outcome of epileptic dogs treated with implantable vagus nerve stimulators. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 37(6). 2102–2108. 3 indexed citations
7.
Behr, Sébastien, et al.. (2022). Surgical techniques used in the management of intra‐arachnoid diverticula in dogs across four referral centres and their immediate outcome. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 63(7). 520–525. 4 indexed citations
8.
Lawn, Richard & Tom Harcourt‐Brown. (2022). Risk factors for early death or euthanasia within 100 days of diagnosis in dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin. The Veterinary Journal. 287. 105884–105884. 11 indexed citations
9.
Volk, Holger A., et al.. (2022). Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings and outcome of dogs undergoing surgical resection for intracranial meningioma: 101 dogs. BMC Veterinary Research. 18(1). 88–88. 7 indexed citations
10.
Harcourt‐Brown, Tom, et al.. (2021). Comparison of serum creatine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase activity in dogs with Neospora meningoencephalitis and noninfectious meningoencephalitis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 36(1). 141–145. 10 indexed citations
11.
Harcourt‐Brown, Tom & Michael Carter. (2021). Implantable vagus nerve stimulator settings and short-term adverse effects in epileptic dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 35(5). 2350–2358. 7 indexed citations
12.
Griffin, John F., Jonathan M. Levine, Wilfried Maï, et al.. (2021). Agreement and differentiation of intradural spinal cord lesions in dogs using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 36(1). 171–178. 2 indexed citations
13.
Harcourt‐Brown, Tom, Nicolas Granger, Noel Fitzpatrick, & Nick D. Jeffery. (2019). Electrodiagnostic findings in dogs with apparently painful lumbosacral foraminal stenosis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 33(5). 2167–2174. 9 indexed citations
14.
Decker, Steven De, Rowena M. A. Packer, Rodolfo Cappello, et al.. (2019). Comparison of signalment and computed tomography findings in French Bulldogs, Pugs, and English Bulldogs with and without clinical signs associated with thoracic hemivertebra. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 33(5). 2151–2159. 19 indexed citations
15.
Jeffery, Nick D., et al.. (2017). Choices and Decisions in Decompressive Surgery for Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disk Herniation. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice. 48(1). 169–186. 12 indexed citations
16.
D’Angelo, Antonio, Osamu Yamato, C. GIORDANO, et al.. (2016). Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis associated with an MFSD8 mutation in Chihuahuas. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 118(4). 326–332. 26 indexed citations
17.
Hu, Hilary Z., et al.. (2015). Systematic Review of Brain Tumor Treatment in Dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 29(6). 1456–1463. 67 indexed citations
18.
Harcourt‐Brown, Tom, Zoe Belshaw, John E. Parker, Nick D. Jeffery, & Nicolas Granger. (2011). Effects of syringomyelia on electrodiagnostic test results in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 72(5). 595–600. 4 indexed citations
19.
Granger, Nicolas, et al.. (2009). Use of a lateral surgical approach to the femoral nerve in the management of two primary femoral nerve sheath tumours. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 22(3). 229–232. 9 indexed citations
20.
Harcourt‐Brown, Tom. (2008). Anticonvulsant responsive, episodic movement disorder in a German shorthaired pointer. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 49(8). 405–407. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026