Todd Shelper
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
Papers in
- Genetics 4
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 3
- Co-authors
- Vicky M. AveryCarrie J. LovittBilal ZulfiqarMelissa L. SykesRohan A. DavisRonald J. QuinnSandra DuffyJames A. St John
- Journals
- Assay and Drug Development Technologies (3 papers)Journal of Natural Products (3 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Biomedical Materials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Todd Shelper
28 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Oncology 322
- Biotechnology 90
- Biophysics 52
- Biomedical Engineering 378
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 246
Countries citing papers authored by Todd Shelper
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Shelper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Shelper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Shelper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Shelper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Shelper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Shelper. The network helps show where Todd Shelper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Todd Shelper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 262 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 143 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 71 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 15 |
About Todd Shelper
Todd Shelper is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Genetics, Biophysics, Microbiology and Oncology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (7 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (6 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (3 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (3 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (322 citations), Biotechnology (90 citations), Biophysics (52 citations), Biomedical Engineering (378 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (246 citations). Todd Shelper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vicky M. Avery, Carrie J. Lovitt, Bilal Zulfiqar, Melissa L. Sykes, Rohan A. Davis, Ronald J. Quinn, Sandra Duffy, James A. St John, Jenny Ekberg and Lynn Nazareth. Their work appears in journals such as Assay and Drug Development Technologies, Journal of Natural Products, Scientific Reports, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Biomedical Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.