Tobias Scharnweber
-
- Forest ecology and management 9
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 4
- Atmospheric Science top 2%
- Tree-ring climate responses 28
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research 5
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 25
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
-
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 2
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology 2
-
- Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology 2
- Co-authors
- Martin WilmkingMichael MantheyChristian SchröderAndreas BauweMarieke van der Maaten‐TheunissenMarko SmiljanićErnst van der MaatenAllan Buras
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Tobias Scharnweber
30 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 616
- Atmospheric Science 792
- Global and Planetary Change 779
- Ecological Modeling 37
- Space and Planetary Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by Tobias Scharnweber
This map shows the geographic impact of Tobias Scharnweber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tobias Scharnweber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobias Scharnweber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tobias Scharnweber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tobias Scharnweber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tobias Scharnweber. The network helps show where Tobias Scharnweber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tobias Scharnweber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 18 | SINOMA - a better tool for proxy based reconstructions? | 2014 | 1 |
| 19 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 44 |
About Tobias Scharnweber
Tobias Scharnweber is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tree-ring climate responses (28 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (25 papers), Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (2 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (616 citations), Atmospheric Science (792 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (779 citations). Tobias Scharnweber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Martin Wilmking, Michael Manthey, Christian Schröder, Andreas Bauwe, Marieke van der Maaten‐Theunissen, Marko Smiljanić, Ernst van der Maaten, Allan Buras, Roberto Cruz‐García and Mario Trouillier.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.