Tobias Förster
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Michael RohlfingPéter KrügerJ. SichelschmidtC. GeibelJ. WosnitzaC. KrellnerClaudia FelserH. S. Jeevan
- Topics
- Iron-based superconductors research (26 papers)Rare-earth and actinide compounds (21 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Tobias Förster
55 papers receiving 932 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 468
- Condensed Matter Physics 453
- Materials Chemistry 451
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 395
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 70
Countries citing papers authored by Tobias Förster
This map shows the geographic impact of Tobias Förster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tobias Förster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobias Förster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tobias Förster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tobias Förster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tobias Förster. The network helps show where Tobias Förster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tobias Förster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tobias Förster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tobias Förster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tobias Förster. Tobias Förster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 188 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 68 |
About Tobias Förster
Tobias Förster is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron-based superconductors research (26 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (21 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (453 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (395 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (468 citations). Tobias Förster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael Rohlfing, Péter Krüger, J. Sichelschmidt, C. Geibel, J. Wosnitza, C. Krellner, Claudia Felser, H. S. Jeevan, M. Yao and Marcus Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.