Tina Tylor

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Tina Tylor is a scholar working on Physiology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Tylor has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Physiology, 5 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Tina Tylor's work include Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (6 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (3 papers). Tina Tylor is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (6 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (3 papers). Tina Tylor collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Tina Tylor's co-authors include Paula Neall, Peter Matthiessen, John P. Sumpter, Susan Jobling, David A. Sheahan, Jule E. Harries, Mark F. Kirby, R. J. G. Rycroft, Edwin J. Routledge and Mark R. Hurst and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemosphere, Marine Pollution Bulletin and Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Tina Tylor

8 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Estrogenic activity in five United Kingdom rivers detecte... 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tina Tylor United Kingdom 7 729 591 526 276 199 8 1.1k
Paula Neall United Kingdom 9 809 1.1× 620 1.0× 569 1.1× 285 1.0× 219 1.1× 10 1.2k
Mark R. Hurst United Kingdom 16 753 1.0× 392 0.7× 578 1.1× 186 0.7× 117 0.6× 24 1.1k
Rémi Thibaut Spain 19 672 0.9× 359 0.6× 414 0.8× 84 0.3× 170 0.9× 21 1.0k
Yiannis Kiparissis Canada 14 887 1.2× 771 1.3× 679 1.3× 310 1.1× 244 1.2× 18 1.6k
Petra Stahlschmidt‐Allner Germany 9 338 0.5× 352 0.6× 347 0.7× 160 0.6× 102 0.5× 9 751
Jule E. Harries United Kingdom 9 840 1.2× 942 1.6× 799 1.5× 445 1.6× 283 1.4× 12 1.5k
Sonia J. Kirby United Kingdom 6 485 0.7× 222 0.4× 405 0.8× 107 0.4× 75 0.4× 9 686
Yukinari Tsuruda Japan 13 497 0.7× 578 1.0× 391 0.7× 211 0.8× 154 0.8× 16 959
Knud Ladegaard Pedersen Denmark 20 731 1.0× 379 0.6× 355 0.7× 96 0.3× 193 1.0× 32 1.1k
Éric Thybaud France 14 470 0.6× 153 0.3× 370 0.7× 74 0.3× 62 0.3× 33 783

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Tylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Tylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Tylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Tylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Tylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Tylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Tylor. The network helps show where Tina Tylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Tylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Tylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Tylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Tylor. Tina Tylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Kirby, Mark F., Mark R. Hurst, Sonia J. Kirby, et al.. (2000). Erod And Che Measurements In Flounder (Platichthys Flesus) As Monitoring Tools In English Estuaries. Open MIND. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kirby, Mark F., Stephen Morris, Mark R. Hurst, et al.. (2000). The Use of Cholinesterase Activity in Flounder (Platichthys flesus) Muscle Tissue as a Biomarker of Neurotoxic Contamination in UK Estuaries. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 40(9). 780–791. 139 indexed citations
3.
Kirby, Mark F., Paula Neall, & Tina Tylor. (1999). EROD activity measured in flatfish from the area of the Sea Empress oil spill. Chemosphere. 38(12). 2929–2949. 57 indexed citations
4.
Kirby, Mark F., Peter Matthiessen, Paula Neall, et al.. (1999). Hepatic EROD Activity in Flounder (Platichthys flesus) as an Indicator of Contaminant Exposure in English Estuaries. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 38(8). 676–686. 52 indexed citations
5.
Harries, Jule E., David A. Sheahan, Susan Jobling, et al.. (1997). ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY IN FIVE UNITED KINGDOM RIVERS DETECTED BY MEASUREMENT OF VITELLOGENESIS IN CAGED MALE TROUT. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 16(3). 534–534. 29 indexed citations
6.
Harries, Jule E., David A. Sheahan, Susan Jobling, et al.. (1997). Estrogenic activity in five United Kingdom rivers detected by measurement of vitellogenesis in caged male trout. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 16(3). 534–542. 511 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Harries, Jule E., David A. Sheahan, Susan Jobling, et al.. (1996). A SURVEY OF ESTROGENIC ACTIVITY IN UNITED KINGDOM INLAND WATERS. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 15(11). 1993–1993. 15 indexed citations
8.
Harries, Jule E., David A. Sheahan, Peter Matthiessen, et al.. (1996). A survey of estrogenic activity in United Kingdom inland waters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 15(11). 1993–2002. 342 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026