Tina Jones

35 total papers · 1.1k total citations
19 papers, 718 citations indexed

About

Tina Jones is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Jones has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 718 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Tina Jones's work include Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Software Engineering Research (2 papers). Tina Jones is often cited by papers focused on Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Software Engineering Research (2 papers). Tina Jones collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Tina Jones's co-authors include David Evans, Marion Eckert, Helen McCutcheon, Deborah J. Jones, Lindsey L. Cohen, Nooredin Mohammadi, Paul Aveyard, Eleni Mantzari, Theresa M. Marteau and Melissa E. Middeldorp and has published in prestigious journals such as Gene, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Addiction.

In The Last Decade

Tina Jones

18 papers receiving 631 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Tina Jones 282 139 114 82 71 19 718
Kleinner Farias 292 1.0× 115 0.8× 9 0.1× 157 1.9× 114 1.6× 67 641
David Bowers 109 0.4× 9 0.1× 65 0.6× 44 0.5× 49 0.7× 44 634
Witold Suryn 378 1.3× 146 1.1× 4 0.0× 123 1.5× 41 0.6× 45 663
Gerit Wagner 83 0.3× 10 0.1× 26 0.2× 75 0.9× 20 0.3× 35 749
Anil Jadhav 148 0.5× 44 0.3× 8 0.1× 170 2.1× 56 0.8× 25 669
N. A. Omoregbe 137 0.5× 25 0.2× 7 0.1× 73 0.9× 37 0.5× 49 626
Margaret Smith 67 0.2× 300 2.2× 17 0.1× 252 3.1× 92 1.3× 38 847
R. Mark Greenwood 113 0.4× 14 0.1× 37 0.3× 106 1.3× 40 0.6× 36 620
Michèle Angelaccio 111 0.4× 12 0.1× 44 0.4× 145 1.8× 260 3.7× 37 643
Isabelle Bichindaritz 85 0.3× 9 0.1× 66 0.6× 381 4.6× 51 0.7× 48 792

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Jones. The network helps show where Tina Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Jones. Tina Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026