Tina Jones
- Information Systems top 2%
- Software top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Co-authors
- David EvansMarion EckertHelen McCutcheonDeborah J. JonesNooredin MohammadiLindsey L. CohenTheresa M. MarteauEleni Mantzari
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (2 papers)Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers)Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Tina Jones
18 papers receiving 633 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Information Systems 282
- Software 139
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 114
- Artificial Intelligence 82
- Computer Networks and Communications 71
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Jones. The network helps show where Tina Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Jones. Tina Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Online Social Movement of #NeverAgain: How Social Networks Build a Sense of Membership, Influence, Support and Emotional Connection on Twitter | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | Estimating software costs | 246 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 102 | |
| 19 | Adaptation of NASTRAN to the Analysis of the Viking Space Vehicle | 1 |
About Tina Jones
Tina Jones is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Family Practice and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (139 citations), Information Systems (282 citations) and Computer Science Applications (46 citations). Tina Jones has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David Evans, Marion Eckert, Helen McCutcheon, Deborah J. Jones, Nooredin Mohammadi, Lindsey L. Cohen, Theresa M. Marteau, Eleni Mantzari, Paul Aveyard and Debra Rowett. Their work appears in journals such as Gene, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Addiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.