Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects1
20001.1k citationsMark Keil, Bernard C. Y. Tan et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Saarinen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Saarinen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Saarinen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Saarinen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Saarinen. The network helps show where Timo Saarinen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timo Saarinen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timo Saarinen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timo Saarinen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Timo Saarinen. Timo Saarinen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tuunanen, Tuure, Matti Rossi, Timo Saarinen, & Lars Mathiassen. (2007). A Contigency Model for Requirements Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 8(11). 569–597.85 indexed citations
Dahlberg, Tomi, Niina Mallat, Timo Saarinen, & Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen. (2001). Efficient Service Production and Consumer Choice Of Delivery Channels. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 20.4 indexed citations
11.
Keil, Mark, Bernard C. Y. Tan, Kwok‐Kee Wei, et al.. (2000). A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects1. MIS Quarterly. 24(2). 299–325.1124 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Saarinen, Timo & Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen. (1998). Research Challenges in Electronic Commerce. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 10(1). 241–248.5 indexed citations
13.
Tuunainen, Virpi Kristiina & Timo Saarinen. (1997). EDI and Internet-EDI: Opportunities of Effective Integration for Small Businesses.. European Conference on Information Systems. 164–177.3 indexed citations
14.
Kivijärvi, Hannu & Timo Saarinen. (1995). Investments in Information Systems and Financial Performance of the Firm. Information & Management. 143–163.6 indexed citations
15.
Saarinen, Timo, et al.. (1995). Outsourcing of Information Systems Services in Finnish Companies.1 indexed citations
16.
Saarinen, Timo. (1993). Success of Information Systems: Evaluation of Development Projects and the Choice of Procurement and Implementation Strategies. Aaltodoc (Aalto University).3 indexed citations
17.
Saarinen, Timo, et al.. (1991). The missing concepts of user participation an empirical assessment of user participation and information system success. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2(1). 25–42.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.