Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Williams more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Williams. The network helps show where Tim Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Williams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Williams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Williams. Tim Williams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Frachetti, Michael D., et al.. (2017). Nomadic ecology shaped the highland geography of Asia’s Silk Roads. Nature. 543(7644). 193–198.152 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Williams, Tim, et al.. (2009). Advancing the patchwork text: the development of patchwork media approaches. The International Journal of Learning Annual Review.2 indexed citations
Franta, Benjamin, et al.. (2007). Laser induced modification of vanadate glasses. Physics and Chemistry of Glasses European Journal of Glass Science and Technology Part B. 48.1 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Tim. (2006). Whose finger will be in the EU battlegroups' trigger?. 46–51.1 indexed citations
8.
Perring, Dominic, et al.. (1998). Archaeological Excavations in the Souks Area of Downtown Beirut. Interim Report of the AUB Project BEY 006 1994-1995. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Leranth, Csaba, Tim Williams, J. Hámori, & Michel Chrétien. (1985). Light and electron microscopic immunocytochemistry of β-endorphin/β-LPH-like immunoreactive neurons in the arcuate nucleus and surrounding areas of the rat hypothalamus. Brain Research. 341(2). 233–242.9 indexed citations
12.
Dawson, Joseph G., et al.. (1984). Dictionary of American military biography. Greenwood Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
Jew, Jean Y. & Tim Williams. (1977). Ultrastructural aspects of bilirubin encephalopathy in cochlear nuclei of the Gunn rat.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 124(Pt 3). 599–614.32 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Tim & Adam D. Dixon. (1963). The intrinsic innervation of the soft palate.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 97. 259–67.7 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Tim, et al.. (1963). A history of the United States, to 1876.1 indexed citations
18.
Williams, Tim, Richard N. Current, & Frank Freidel. (1961). A history of the United States : since 1865. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).4 indexed citations
Lincoln, Abraham & Tim Williams. (1957). Abraham Lincoln : selected speeches, messages, and letters. Holt, Rinehart and Winston eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.