Tim C. Rehders
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 2%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christoph NienaberStephan KischeHüseyin İnceHolger EggebrechtMichael PetzschTilo KleinfeldtBurkhart ZipfelMartin Czerny
- Topics
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (37 papers)Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (36 papers)Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Tim C. Rehders
69 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.7k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.1k
- Surgery 1.4k
- Epidemiology 333
- Genetics 299
Countries citing papers authored by Tim C. Rehders
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim C. Rehders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim C. Rehders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim C. Rehders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim C. Rehders
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim C. Rehders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim C. Rehders. The network helps show where Tim C. Rehders may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim C. Rehders
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim C. Rehders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim C. Rehders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim C. Rehders. Tim C. Rehders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 86 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | Randomized Comparison of Strategies for Type B Aortic Dissectionbreakdown → | 510 |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 138 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 65 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Tim C. Rehders
Tim C. Rehders is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Genetics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (37 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (36 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.1k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.7k citations) and Surgery (1.4k citations). Tim C. Rehders has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Nienaber, Stephan Kische, Hüseyin İnce, Holger Eggebrecht, Michael Petzsch, Tilo Kleinfeldt, Burkhart Zipfel, Martin Czerny, Rossella Fattori and Dierk Scheinert. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and European Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.