Tilman Börgers
- Management Science and Operations Research top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Safety Research top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rajiv SarinDaniel KrähmerRoland StrauszChristian DustmannAntonio J. MoralesMaarten JanssenTimothy McQuadePeter Norman
- Topics
- Game Theory and Applications (20 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (20 papers)Game Theory and Voting Systems (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tilman Börgers
31 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Management Science and Operations Research 764
- Economics and Econometrics 584
- Safety Research 395
- Sociology and Political Science 302
- Political Science and International Relations 124
Countries citing papers authored by Tilman Börgers
This map shows the geographic impact of Tilman Börgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tilman Börgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tilman Börgers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tilman Börgers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tilman Börgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tilman Börgers. The network helps show where Tilman Börgers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tilman Börgers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tilman Börgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tilman Börgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tilman Börgers. Tilman Börgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 187 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | Common Prior Type Spaces In Which Payoff Types and Belief Types Are Independent | 1 |
| 8 | An optimal Voting System when Voting is costly | 0 |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 135 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Is internet voting a good thing | 6 |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Tilman Börgers
Tilman Börgers is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (20 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (20 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (764 citations), General Decision Sciences (87 citations) and Safety Research (395 citations). Tilman Börgers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rajiv Sarin, Daniel Krähmer, Roland Strausz, Christian Dustmann, Antonio J. Morales, Maarten Janssen, Timothy McQuade, Peter Norman, Katalin Bognar and Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Econometrica and The Economic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.