Tian‐wu Chen

1.7k citations
108 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Tian‐wu Chen

104 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Tian‐wu Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Hepatology 190
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 516
  • Surgery 562
  • Gastroenterology 54
  • Oncology 256
Replace N. Holzknecht with:
N. Holzknecht Germany
Sun Young Choi South Korea
Raghunandan Vikram United States
Kenji Ibukuro Japan
Gianpaolo Carrafiello Italy
Guido Bonomo Italy
V G McDermott United States
Michael T. Corwin United States
Masakatsu Tsurusaki Japan
Vincenzo David Italy
Tian‐wu Chen relative to N. Holzknecht Germany N. Holzknecht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29.6×
N. Holzknecht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tian‐wu Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tian‐wu Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tian‐wu Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tian‐wu Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tian‐wu Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tian‐wu Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tian‐wu Chen. The network helps show where Tian‐wu Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tian‐wu Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tian‐wu Chen Line = papers co-authored together Tian‐wu Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200779
2 201863
3 200658
4 201943
5 201335
6 201032
7 202130
8 202029
9 200925
10 201925
11 202123
12 200922
13 201521
14 202120
15 201020
16 201220
17 201420
18 200818
19 201318
20 201818

About Tian‐wu Chen

Tian‐wu Chen is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Hepatology and Oncology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (28 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (26 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (23 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (22 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (17 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (16 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (16 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (190 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (516 citations), Surgery (562 citations), Gastroenterology (54 citations) and Oncology (256 citations). Tian‐wu Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Zhi‐gang Yang, Xiao Ming Zhang, Rui Li, Jiani Hu, Huijiao Chen, Yong Chen, Jin Yao, Qiling Wang, Jing Ou and Changqiang Wu. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Radiology, European Radiology, Frontiers in Oncology, PLoS ONE and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact