Thorsten Ostendorp
About
In The Last Decade
Thorsten Ostendorp
5 papers receiving 454 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Molecular Biology 371
- Clinical Biochemistry 152
- Immunology 81
- Physiology 46
- Nutrition and Dietetics 42
Countries citing papers authored by Thorsten Ostendorp
This map shows the geographic impact of Thorsten Ostendorp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thorsten Ostendorp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thorsten Ostendorp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thorsten Ostendorp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thorsten Ostendorp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thorsten Ostendorp. The network helps show where Thorsten Ostendorp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thorsten Ostendorp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thorsten Ostendorp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thorsten Ostendorp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thorsten Ostendorp. Thorsten Ostendorp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 208 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 161 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.