Thomas Zhou

765 citations
8 papers · 173 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 2
    • Statistical Methods in Epidemiology 1
    • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes 1
    • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 1
    • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research 1

Thomas Zhou

8 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Thomas Zhou
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 85
  • Clinical Psychology 31
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 18
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 15
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 10
Replace Vanessa Siffredi with:
Vanessa Siffredi Switzerland
Rachel Brown United Kingdom
Teresa Sadeghin United States
Anna Järvinen United States
Francesca Bottino Italy
Jane L. Peterson United States
Matthew So United States
María Claudia Lattig Colombia
Cora Taylor United States
Kristina M. Haebich Australia
Thomas Zhou relative to Vanessa Siffredi Switzerland Vanessa Siffredi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Vanessa Siffredi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Zhou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Zhou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Zhou. The network helps show where Thomas Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Zhou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Zhou Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Zhou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 201583
2 201340
3 201728
4 202010
5 20075
6 20204
7 20222
8 20201

About Thomas Zhou

Thomas Zhou is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 8 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (1 paper), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (85 citations), Clinical Psychology (31 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (18 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (15 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (10 citations). Thomas Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Kolevzon, Jin Fan, Xiaosi Gu, Latha Soorya, Evdokia Anagnostou, Patrick R. Hof, Karl Friston, Tehila Eilam‐Stock, A.N. Plotnikov and Ming‐Ming Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Statistics in Medicine, Biometrical Journal, European Journal of Neuroscience and Human Brain Mapping.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact