Thomas Zhou

737 total citations
8 papers, 169 citations indexed

About

Thomas Zhou is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Zhou has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 169 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Statistics and Probability, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Thomas Zhou's work include Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). Thomas Zhou is often cited by papers focused on Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). Thomas Zhou collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Thomas Zhou's co-authors include Evdokia Anagnostou, Patrick R. Hof, Xiaosi Gu, Alexander Kolevzon, Jin Fan, Latha Soorya, Karl Friston, Tehila Eilam‐Stock, E. V. Rusinova and A.N. Plotnikov and has published in prestigious journals such as Statistics in Medicine, European Journal of Neuroscience and Human Brain Mapping.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Zhou

8 papers receiving 166 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Zhou United States	5	84	42	35	30	16	8	169
Rachel Brown United Kingdom	4	98 1.2×	19 0.5×	44 1.3×	17 0.6×	15 0.9×	9	213
Dilraj Sokhi Kenya	7	63 0.8×	15 0.4×	17 0.5×	60 2.0×	16 1.0×	28	229
C Sattler Germany	6	227 2.7×	18 0.4×	19 0.5×	19 0.6×	15 0.9×	8	371
María Claudia Lattig Colombia	7	32 0.4×	30 0.7×	35 1.0×	12 0.4×	13 0.8×	15	184
Scott Smith United States	6	62 0.7×	23 0.5×	13 0.4×	31 1.0×	11 0.7×	10	184
Peter J. Belin United States	10	41 0.5×	29 0.7×	125 3.6×	138 4.6×	9 0.6×	29	383
Huijun Qian United States	6	52 0.6×	61 1.5×	23 0.7×	28 0.9×	8 0.5×	6	158
Jane L. Peterson United States	6	35 0.4×	95 2.3×	49 1.4×	22 0.7×	6 0.4×	7	202
Cora Taylor United States	10	97 1.2×	31 0.7×	51 1.5×	30 1.0×	20 1.3×	22	241
Biyuan Chen China	5	58 0.7×	17 0.4×	49 1.4×	18 0.6×	5 0.3×	7	140

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Zhou

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Zhou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Zhou

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Zhou. The network helps show where Thomas Zhou may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Zhou

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Zhou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Zhou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Zhou. Thomas Zhou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Zhou, Thomas, Michael P. LaValley, Kerrie P. Nelson, Howard Cabral, & Joseph M. Massaro. (2022). Calculating power for the Finkelstein and Schoenfeld test statistic for a composite endpoint with two components. Statistics in Medicine. 41(17). 3321–3335. 2 indexed citations

2.

Zhou, Thomas, Subitha Lakshminarayanan, Sonali Sarkar, et al.. (2020). Predictors of Loss to Follow-Up among Men with Tuberculosis in Puducherry and Tamil Nadu, India. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 103(3). 1050–1056. 9 indexed citations

3.

Zhou, Thomas, Sughra Raza, & Kerrie P. Nelson. (2020). Methods of assessing categorical agreement between correlated screening tests in clinical studies. Journal of Applied Statistics. 48(10). 1861–1881. 4 indexed citations

4.

Nelson, Kerrie P., Thomas Zhou, & Don Edwards. (2020). Measuring intrarater association between correlated ordinal ratings. Biometrical Journal. 62(7). 1687–1701. 1 indexed citations

5.

Gu, Xiaosi, Thomas Zhou, Evdokia Anagnostou, et al.. (2017). Heightened brain response to pain anticipation in high‐functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. European Journal of Neuroscience. 47(6). 592–601. 28 indexed citations

6.

Gu, Xiaosi, Tehila Eilam‐Stock, Thomas Zhou, et al.. (2015). Autonomic and brain responses associated with empathy deficits in autism spectrum disorder. Human Brain Mapping. 36(9). 3323–3338. 81 indexed citations

7.

Plotnikov, A.N., et al.. (2013). Structural Insights into Acetylated-Histone H4 Recognition by the Bromodomain-PHD Finger Module of Human Transcriptional Coactivator CBP. Structure. 22(2). 353–360. 39 indexed citations

8.

Chiang, Kevin C.H., et al.. (2007). Emerging Market Bonds as an Asset Class. The Journal of Investing. 16(3). 104–110. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact