Thomas Wein

572 citations
28 papers · 441 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Wein

25 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Thomas Wein
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 147
  • Molecular Biology 292
  • Insect Science 47
  • Spectroscopy 55
  • Pharmacology 41
Replace Mette Laursen with:
Mette Laursen Denmark
Menno B. Tol Netherlands
Mehriar Amininasab Iran
Yoshiharu Hayashi Japan
Qiangwang Fan China
James Z. Deng United States
Cédric Bouysset France
G.F. Ruda United Kingdom
Konkallu Hanumae Gowd India
Daniel Spinks United Kingdom
Thomas Wein relative to Mette Laursen Denmark Mette Laursen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Mette Laursen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wein. The network helps show where Thomas Wein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Wein Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Wein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990102
2 199938
3 201127
4 201527
5 200926
6 201625
7 199221
8 201720
9 201720
10 201719
11 201617
12 201816
13 201814
14 199113
15 201712
16 201810
17 20189
18 20237
19 20254
20 20184

About Thomas Wein

Thomas Wein is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Pharmacology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (3 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (147 citations), Molecular Biology (292 citations), Insect Science (47 citations), Spectroscopy (55 citations) and Pharmacology (41 citations). Thomas Wein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Klaus T. Wanner, Horst Kessler, Georg Höfner, Matthias Köck, Matthias Gehrke, Jörg Pabel, Karin V. Niessen, Thomas Seeger, Horst Thiermann and Lars Allmendinger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, ChemMedChem, Toxicology Letters, Journal of Neuroscience and Bioorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact