Thomas Tymoczko
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 2%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 2
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 5
- Co-authors
- Jay L. GarfieldJonathan Vogel
- Journals
- Synthese (2 papers)Journal of Symbolic Logic (2 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Tymoczko
15 papers receiving 176 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Theoretical Computer Science 44
- History and Philosophy of Science 70
- Philosophy 50
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 61
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Tymoczko
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Tymoczko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Tymoczko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Tymoczko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Tymoczko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Tymoczko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Tymoczko. The network helps show where Thomas Tymoczko may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Tymoczko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New directions in the philosophy of mathematics : an anthology | 1998 | 17 |
| 2 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 3 | Sweet Reason: A Field Guide to Modern Logic | 1994 | 14 |
| 4 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 6 | Review: Eric Livingston, The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics | 1989 | 1 |
| 7 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 122 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1 |
About Thomas Tymoczko
Thomas Tymoczko is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Geometry and Topology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (1 paper), Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper), Mathematics and Applications (1 paper) and Color perception and design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (44 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (70 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (61 citations). Thomas Tymoczko has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jay L. Garfield and Jonathan Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Journal of Symbolic Logic, The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.