Thomas Spiegel

33 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

Thomas Spiegel
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 22
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 29
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 169
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 8
  • Computer Networks and Communications 58
Replace J. Wayne Meredith with:
J. Wayne Meredith United States
Haesoon Lee United States
Anil Saxena India
Sofía Ruiz de Gauna Spain
Takeshi Sakamoto Japan
Peter Paterson Australia
Ali Araghi United States
Johan van der Merwe South Africa
Xiaomin Duan Germany
Chao‐Lin Cheng Taiwan
Thomas Spiegel relative to J. Wayne Meredith United States J. Wayne Meredith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
J. Wayne Meredith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Spiegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Spiegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Spiegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Spiegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Spiegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Spiegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Spiegel. The network helps show where Thomas Spiegel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Spiegel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Spiegel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Spiegel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199571
2 198445
3 202127
4 200226
5 201818
6 202017
7 201715
8 200114
9 201913
10 202013
11 199710
12 199910
13 20216
14 20176
15 20215
16 20215
17 20165
18 20025
19 20024
20 20144

About Thomas Spiegel

Thomas Spiegel is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (11 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (10 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (7 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (3 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (22 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (29 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (169 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (8 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (58 citations). Thomas Spiegel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include M. Klonz, H. Laiz, Eric L. Effmann, Evan K. Fram, Peter Vock, H. Sasaki, Kunihiko Takahashi, E. Keßler, T. Funck and Zbigniew Lewandowski. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Measurement Science and Technology, AIDS and Behavior and The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact