Thomas Spangehl
- Atmospheric Science top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Co-authors
- Uwe UlbrichJoaquim G. PintoGregor C. LeckebuschUlrich CubaschMark ReyersP. SpethSemjon SchimankeStefan Zacharias
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (20 papers)Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (11 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Spangehl
25 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Atmospheric Science 962
- Global and Planetary Change 930
- Oceanography 200
- Earth-Surface Processes 47
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 44
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Spangehl
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Spangehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Spangehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Spangehl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Spangehl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Spangehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Spangehl. The network helps show where Thomas Spangehl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Spangehl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Spangehl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Spangehl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Spangehl. Thomas Spangehl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 181 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 184 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 107 | |
| 20 | Katabatic winds over Antarctica and the relationship with Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation variability | 1 |
About Thomas Spangehl
Thomas Spangehl is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (20 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (11 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (962 citations), Global and Planetary Change (930 citations) and Oceanography (200 citations). Thomas Spangehl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Ulbrich, Joaquim G. Pinto, Gregor C. Leckebusch, Ulrich Cubasch, Mark Reyers, P. Speth, Semjon Schimanke, Stefan Zacharias, B. Koffi and Steffen Zacharias. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Climate and Geophysical Research Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.