Thomas Skjødt
About
In The Last Decade
Thomas Skjødt
9 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Surgery 199
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 105
- Rheumatology 91
- Epidemiology 65
- Immunology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Skjødt
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Skjødt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Skjødt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Skjødt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Skjødt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Skjødt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Skjødt. The network helps show where Thomas Skjødt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Skjødt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Skjødt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Skjødt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Skjødt. Thomas Skjødt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 158 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | [CT study of brain atrophy--the value of various study methods]. | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.