Thomas Simpson

23 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Thomas Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Sensory Systems 21
  • Otorhinolaryngology 15
  • Political Science and International Relations 57
  • Theoretical Computer Science 2
  • Anthropology 16
Replace Charles H. Long with:
Charles H. Long United States
David Lieberman United States
Michael Wilding Australia
Ginter Ek Russia
Jordan Sand United States
David L. Howell United States
John R. Hale United States
Michael Robinson United States
Daniel J Philippon United States
David Todd Canada
Thomas Simpson relative to Charles H. Long United States Charles H. Long's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles H. Long · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Simpson. The network helps show where Thomas Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197440
2 199330
3 198420
4 199516
5 202114
6 202311
7 200911
8 20178
9 20158
10
The Comic Mask in the Commedia dell'Arte: Actor Training, Improvisation, and the Poetics of Survival
20078
11 19876
12 19885
13 20015
14 20165
15 20184
16 19883
17 19813
18
Murder and Media in the New Rome: The Fadda Affair
20103
19 19652
20 20202

About Thomas Simpson

Thomas Simpson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers) and Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (21 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (15 citations), Political Science and International Relations (57 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and Anthropology (16 citations). Thomas Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Smith, P. Ashley Wackym, Bruce J. Gantz, Harriet Mercer, Robyn L. Fisher, Alan Randich, Dail W. Mullins, Antonio Fava, James T. Bradley and Pier Paolo Pasolini. Their work appears in journals such as PAJ A Journal of Performance and Art, The Laryngoscope, The Historical Journal, Journal of Historical Geography and History of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact