Thomas S. Kidd

23 papers receiving 83 citations

Peers

Thomas S. Kidd
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • History 19
  • Religious studies 9
  • Political Science and International Relations 38
  • Gender Studies 11
  • Rehabilitation 6
Replace Esther Fuchs with:
Esther Fuchs United States
Hannah More
Irene Schneider Germany
Shannon McSheffrey Canada
W. Cole Durham United States
Bernadette Andrea United States
G. M. Ditchfield United Kingdom
Angus Hawkins United States
Francesca Miller United States
John A. Dwyer Canada
Thomas S. Kidd relative to Esther Fuchs United States Esther Fuchs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Esther Fuchs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Kidd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Kidd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Kidd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Kidd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Kidd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Kidd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Kidd. The network helps show where Thomas S. Kidd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Thomas S. Kidd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas S. Kidd Line = papers co-authored together Thomas S. Kidd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202115
2
Who Is an Evangelical?: The History of a Movement in Crisis
201913
3
The Protestant Interest: New England After Puritanism
200410
4 20239
5 20169
6 20038
7 20168
8 20047
9 20196
10 20244
11 20034
12 20083
13 20222
14 20042
15 20202
16 20222
17 20062
18
American Colonial History: Clashing Cultures and Faiths
20162
19 20221
20 20191

About Thomas S. Kidd

Thomas S. Kidd is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Surgery, Sociology and Political Science and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 114 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (12 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (19 citations), Religious studies (9 citations), Political Science and International Relations (38 citations), Gender Studies (11 citations) and Rehabilitation (6 citations). Thomas S. Kidd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Stuart W. Waterston, Ghulam Nabi, Norman Pratt, Stewart Fleming, David K. Wallace, David Izadi, Janak Bechar, Adriaan O. Grobbelaar, Taimur Shoaib and Dhananjay Kulkarni. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, The New England Quarterly, The William and Mary Quarterly, BMC Cancer and Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact