Thomas Röth

5.1k citations
83 papers · 3.5k indexed · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Röth

77 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Röth
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.4k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.0k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.2k
  • Physiology 654
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 297
Replace Cynthia M. Dorsey with:
Cynthia M. Dorsey United States
Todd J. Swick United States
Michael J. Thorpy United States
Arthur J. Spielman United States
Karl Doghramji United States
Dalva Poyares Brazil
H. Heith Durrence United States
Maria Basta Greece
Joyce D. Kales United States
William K. Wohlgemuth United States
Thomas Röth relative to Cynthia M. Dorsey United States Cynthia M. Dorsey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cynthia M. Dorsey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Röth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Röth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Röth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Röth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Röth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Röth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Röth. The network helps show where Thomas Röth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Röth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Röth Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Röth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20242
4 20188
5 201527
6 201336
7 20131
8 201228
9 201145
10 201193
11 2005135
12 200497
13 19988
14 19974
15 1997133
16 19933
17
A review of the safety profiles of benzodiazepine hypnotics.
199137
18
Ethanol and daytime sleepiness
19906
19 199031
20 198829

About Thomas Röth

Thomas Röth is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 83 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (50 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (44 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (12 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (9 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (7 papers), Restless Legs Syndrome Research (6 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.4k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.0k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.2k citations), Physiology (654 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (297 citations). Thomas Röth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher L. Drake, Sonia Ancoli‐Israel, Timothy Roehrs, Frank Zorick, James K. Walsh, Pietro Badia, Martin B. Scharf, Naomi Breslau, C. W. Stubbs and Laura H. Swibel Rosenthal. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Sleep Medicine, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry and Sleep Medicine Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026