Thomas R. Sexton

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Thomas R. Sexton is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas R. Sexton has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 21 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 5 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Thomas R. Sexton's work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers). Thomas R. Sexton is often cited by papers focused on Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers). Thomas R. Sexton collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Thomas R. Sexton's co-authors include Herbert F. Lewis, Richard H. Silkman, Andrew J. Hogan, Lawrence Bodin, Christie L. Comunale, Howard W. Makofsky, Andrew F. Coburn, Dermot Diamond, Marc J. Shapiro and Mark M. Meléndez and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Operational Research and Medical Care.

In The Last Decade

Thomas R. Sexton

51 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions

1986 1.0k citations Thomas R. Sexton, Richard H. Silkman et al. profile →

Peers

Thomas R. Sexton

MSOR

EE

IME

CSE

MIS

Xiaoyang Zhou China

Zilla Sinuany‐Stern Israel

Ming‐Miin Yu Taiwan

Jiasen Sun China

Junfei Chu China

Yao Chen China

Konstantinos Triantis United States

L. Seiford United States

James Odeck Norway

Adel Hatami‐Marbini Iran

Xiaoyang Zhou China

Thomas R. Sexton

923 ×0.5

MSOR

503 ×0.6

EE

268 ×0.8

IME

260 ×0.9

CSE

300 ×1.1

MIS

Citations per year, relative to Thomas R. Sexton Thomas R. Sexton (= 1×) peers Xiaoyang Zhou

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas R. Sexton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. Sexton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. Sexton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. Sexton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas R. Sexton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. Sexton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. Sexton. The network helps show where Thomas R. Sexton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas R. Sexton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas R. Sexton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas R. Sexton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas R. Sexton. Thomas R. Sexton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (2024). Spinal Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Chronic Back Pain: A Feasibility Study In Veterans. Pain Management. 14(2). 17–28. 1 indexed citations

2.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (2023). Using data envelopment analysis to measure and improve organizational performance. Public Administration Review. 83(5). 1150–1165. 3 indexed citations

3.

Lumry, William R., Timothy Craig, John Anderson, et al.. (2023). Patient outcomes associated with subcutaneous C1INH prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema: a retrospective analysis. Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology. 19(1). 105–105. 3 indexed citations

4.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (2022). Using Data Analytics to Improve Nursing Home Quality. Quality Management in Health Care. 32(2). 87–93. 1 indexed citations

5.

Comunale, Christie L., et al.. (2021). Performance Targets for School Districts.. Educational research quarterly. 44(3). 61–91. 1 indexed citations

6.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (2017). Measuring Hospital Performance Using Mortality Rates: An Alternative to the RAMR. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 7(4). 308–316. 9 indexed citations

7.

Scott, Lisa Benz, et al.. (2013). Examining the Effect of a Patient Navigation Intervention on Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Awareness and Enrollment. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention. 33(5). 281–291. 36 indexed citations

8.

Lewis, Herbert F., et al.. (2010). An Efficiency-Based Multicriteria Strategic Planning Model for Ambulatory Surgery Centers. Journal of Medical Systems. 35(5). 1029–1037. 8 indexed citations

9.

Sexton, Thomas R.. (2010). An Efficiency Analysis of U.S. Business Schools.. 1. 5 indexed citations

10.

Meléndez, Mark M., et al.. (2008). The Importance of Basic Science and Clinical Research as a Selection Criterion for General Surgery Residency Programs. Journal of surgical education. 65(2). 151–154. 48 indexed citations

11.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (2005). Alleviating blood shortages in a resource‐constrained environment. Transfusion. 45(7). 1118–1126. 37 indexed citations

12.

Lewis, Herbert F. & Thomas R. Sexton. (2005). Innovative Design for Courses with Group Projects. INFORMS Transactions on Education. 5(3). 33–41. 1 indexed citations

13.

Lewis, Herbert F. & Thomas R. Sexton. (2004). Data Envelopment Analysis with Reverse Inputs and Outputs. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 21(2). 113–132. 58 indexed citations

14.

Comunale, Christie L., et al.. (2003). The auditors’ client inquiry process. Managerial Auditing Journal. 18(2). 128–133. 7 indexed citations

15.

Comunale, Christie L., et al.. (2001). The Effectiveness of Course Web Sites in Higher Education: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 30(2). 171–190. 9 indexed citations

16.

Makofsky, Howard W., et al.. (1994). The Effect of Craniovertebral Fusion on Occlusion. CRANIO®. 12(1). 38–46. 10 indexed citations

17.

Koenig, Kristi L., et al.. (1994). Ketorolac vs Meperidine for the Management of Pain in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 1(6). 544–549. 15 indexed citations

18.

Makofsky, Howard W., et al.. (1991). The Effect of Head Posture on Muscle Contact Position Using the T-Scan System of Occlusal Analysis. CRANIO®. 9(4). 316–321. 45 indexed citations

19.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (1989). Evaluating Managerial Efficiency of Veterans Administration Medical Centers Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Medical Care. 27(12). 1175–1188. 48 indexed citations

20.

Sexton, Thomas R., et al.. (1989). The Impact of Prospective Reimbursement on Nursing Home Efficiency. Medical Care. 27(2). 154–163. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact