Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1986, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Thomas R. Sexton, Richard H. Silkman and Andrew J. Hogan covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (888 citations), Economics and Econometrics (354 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (197 citations). Published in New Directions for Program Evaluation.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441 →

Countries where authors are citing Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026