Thomas R. Kulp

2.6k citations
29 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas R. Kulp

29 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas R. Kulp
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Environmental Chemistry 1.1k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 700
  • Pollution 546
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 224
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 250
Replace Shelley E. Hoeft with:
Shelley E. Hoeft United States
Mitchell J. Herbel United States
Jeffra K. Schaefer United States
Frank Krikowa Australia
Hans‐Joachim Stärk Germany
Marie‐Pierre Isaure France
Dietmar Glindemann Germany
V. Niedan Germany
Sylvain Bouchet France
Thomas R. Kulp relative to Shelley E. Hoeft United States Shelley E. Hoeft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Shelley E. Hoeft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas R. Kulp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas R. Kulp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas R. Kulp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas R. Kulp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas R. Kulp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas R. Kulp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas R. Kulp. The network helps show where Thomas R. Kulp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas R. Kulp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas R. Kulp Line = papers co-authored together Thomas R. Kulp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008172
2 2016169
3 2004160
4 2005131
5 2004129
6 2013126
7 2006108
8 201592
9 200783
10 200975
11 201373
12 201455
13 201354
14 201548
15 201040
16 200433
17 201232
18 201225
19 201120
20 202017

About Thomas R. Kulp

Thomas R. Kulp is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Water Science and Technology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Arsenic contamination and mitigation (23 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (12 papers), Heavy metals in environment (8 papers), Fluoride Effects and Removal (5 papers), Chromium effects and bioremediation (4 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (2 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (1.1k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (700 citations), Pollution (546 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (224 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (250 citations). Thomas R. Kulp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ronald S. Oremland, Shelley E. Hoeft, Laurence G. Miller, John F. Stolz, Lisa M. Pratt, James T. Hollibaugh, Jodi Switzer Blum, Brian Lanoil, S. M. Baesman and Chad Saltikov. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Science, Extremophiles, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact