Thomas Poole
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Legal principles and applications
- Criminal Law and Evidence
-
- European and International Law Studies
- International Law and Human Rights
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
Papers in
- Law 29
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 27
- Legal principles and applications 15
- Law in Society and Culture 5
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 9
- International Law and Human Rights 6
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 4
Thomas Poole
43 papers receiving 165 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Law 111
- Political Science and International Relations 102
- Sociology and Political Science 90
- History 13
- Philosophy 14
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Poole
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Poole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Poole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Poole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Poole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Poole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Poole. The network helps show where Thomas Poole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Poole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 14 | The impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords | 2009 | 1 |
| 15 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 16 | Courts and conditions of uncertainty in "times of crisis" | 2008 | 3 |
| 17 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 18 | Of headscarves and heresies: the Denbigh High School case and public authority decision-making under the Human Rights Act | 2005 | 3 |
| 19 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 13 |
About Thomas Poole
Thomas Poole is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Archeology, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (27 papers), Legal principles and applications (15 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (9 papers), International Law and Human Rights (6 papers), Law in Society and Culture (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Ombudsman and Human Rights (4 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (111 citations), Political Science and International Relations (102 citations), Sociology and Political Science (90 citations), History (13 citations) and Philosophy (14 citations). Thomas Poole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include David Dyzenhaus, Syed Faisal Shah, Luke McDonagh and Simon Deakin. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Law Review, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, European Journal of International Law and Archives and Records.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.