Thomas Pérot

1.6k citations
34 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Pérot

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Pérot
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 856
  • Global and Planetary Change 776
  • Atmospheric Science 307
  • Insect Science 171
  • Forestry 25
Replace Arun K. Bose with:
Arun K. Bose Switzerland
Axel Albrecht Germany
Jochen Dieler Germany
Ignacio Barbeito Canada
Brigitte Rohner Switzerland
Jean‐Christophe Hervé France
Kamil Bielak Poland
Any Mary Petriţan Romania
Jürgen Nagel Germany
Ion Cătălin Petrițan Romania
Thomas Pérot relative to Arun K. Bose Switzerland Arun K. Bose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Arun K. Bose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pérot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pérot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pérot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pérot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pérot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pérot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pérot. The network helps show where Thomas Pérot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pérot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pérot Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pérot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014188
2 2015182
3 2014154
4 201965
5 201163
6 201747
7 201543
8 201143
9 201833
10 201332
11 201626
12 201722
13 201019
14 201719
15 201618
16 201817
17 201812
18 201312
19 202112
20 201810

About Thomas Pérot

Thomas Pérot is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, Ecology and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Forest Management and Policy (15 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (14 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (8 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (3 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (856 citations), Global and Planetary Change (776 citations), Atmospheric Science (307 citations), Insect Science (171 citations) and Forestry (25 citations). Thomas Pérot has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Vallet, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Sandrine Perret, Maude Toïgo, Benoît Courbaud, Christian Piedallu, Jean‐Daniel Bontemps, Nicolas Picard, François Goreaud and Philippe Balandier. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Basic and Applied Ecology, European Journal of Forest Research and Journal of Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact