Thomas Payne

1.2k citations
30 papers · 740 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 4
    • Neurological disorders and treatments 3
    • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research 2
    • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 5

Thomas Payne

27 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

Thomas Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Plant Science 423
  • Horticulture 6
  • Molecular Biology 425
  • Developmental Neuroscience 24
  • Virology 21
Replace Yanli Niu with:
Yanli Niu China
Diana Schmidt Germany
Aldrin Kay‐Yuen Yim Hong Kong
Ora Son South Korea
Lynn A. Litterer United States
Kyung Min Chung South Korea
Thomas Poyot France
Judith M. Candy Australia
Hugo Klaassen Belgium
Asael Roichman Israel
Thomas Payne relative to Yanli Niu China Yanli Niu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yanli Niu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Payne. The network helps show where Thomas Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Payne Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Payne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001170
2 2004160
3 1999132
4 201859
5 202329
6 202028
7 201123
8 202222
9 202021
10 202318
11 202310
12 20239
13 20208
14 20178
15 20227
16 19916
17 20226
18 19986
19 20244
20 20224

About Thomas Payne

Thomas Payne is a scholar working on Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (423 citations), Horticulture (6 citations), Molecular Biology (425 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (24 citations) and Virology (21 citations). Thomas Payne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anna M. Koltunow, Susan D. Johnson, Alan Lloyd, David Arnold, John G. Clement, Elizabeth S. Dennis, Matthew R. Tucker, W. James Peacock, Ming Luo and Abdul M. Chaudhury. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Development, Experimental Neurology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact